It could be a bad plating job. :goofer: Whatever it is, it sure is kewl! :thumb: Thanks for sharing! Ribbit
This is what I call the Orange Peel look on some of the Lincoln Proof Cents! IMHO it is due to a light viscosity of grease or oil on the Dies creating pressure ridges on the surfaces when it was struck. I hope that Mike Diamond see this one as it the effect that I mentioned in a post way back last year or earlier! Frank
I am with toad on this one. The die may be worn also, but the die would not cause all the lines to be parallel. That comes from the roller during the plating process.
This is what I thought at first but LOOK at the rest of the coin, there is no wear. In Fact the Lincoln Statue on the Reverse and the Bow tie on the Obverse show EXTREME details, along with this being a PROOF coin, there does not seem to be that many strikes with this die. The markings are also strange as the orange peel effect is definitely present over the Lincoln memorial but the rest does not seem to be the same thing ... Just some of my thoughts
Very interesting. I was thinking the same thing as GD, but bobsmo makes a good point IMHO. Nice coin! :thumb: Phoenix
You guys made me take a closer look. I'll agree they are not flow lines, but will still say they it's a worn out die as that what causes the orange peel. As for the parallel lines - die polishing. Look close at this section. The only thing that could create those raised lines in a crosshatched pattern is if the die was polished first one direction and from a different direction 90 degrees to the first.
Look at the obverse, Doug. Those lines go right through Abe and, less obviously, through the memorial. They are not raised as in the fields, but they are still there. And, how are you going to get die polishing lines that deep on a proof. That is clad separation.
Contamination on the zinc round. Could be some machine in the sheet formation prior to stamping them into rounds? Ribbit
Lot's of possibilities Toad, but I think you're reaching. Die polishing seems to make the most sense and be the most likely cause.
OK, the zinc is only rolled one direction. Can you assure me that the copper is rolled the same direction?
I am learning something here so, what if it were a contamination with a foreign object? Again..I am just throwing this posibility out there! Cuz I do not know... RickieB
The copper isn't rolled at all. Think what a roll of coin strip looks like. It's XX inches wide and a big roll XXX feet long and then sent through the rollers lengthwise. Then the planchets are cut from the zinc roll. Then the planchets are plated.
I will concede that part of the problem may be an issue of a plating problem but I don't believe that it is the main culprit for the linear orange peel lines! I still think that the main culprit is an issue of pressure ridges that traveled outward as well as along (parallel) to the Die Polish lines. Note how squiggly the orange peel lines are on the coin. These sqiggly lines IMO can only be explained due to pressure ridges developing and traveling along the Die Polish lines and due to the extreme pressure at which the coins is struck, the grease or oil also exerted pressure outwards on those created pressure ridhge lines. I edited and cropped the pictures of the coin and have attached them to this post. I hope that they better show all of the lines in the fields as well as through the devices! Frank
Yeah, a strike-through. I thought of that. But a hairnet or piece of cloth would have the crosshatched pattern all over and would only be on 1 side of the coin. This coin has marks on both sides. The orange peel pattern proves the die was worn out, thus it would need polishing. That much is pretty much indisputable. The only real question comes from what could produce the raised parallel pattern on one side of the coin and the crosshatched pattern, combined with the orange peel pattern on the other side. The only logical explanation to me is that 1 die was polished all in the same ditrection and the other die was polished from 2 directions at 90 degrees to each other. 'Course I can't say definitively that is the case. But it sure makes sense to me.
The copper is not rolled? Just how does it get so thin if it is not rolled? I understand that there are 3 layers and they are sent through a roll to become one strip, but each of those 3 layers is rolled separately.
OK Frank - now tell me how the grease can flow at right angles to itself ? And the circled area is the only place where the orange peel effect is visible. The rest is something else.