But It has the That John Kom feeling.

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by BenSi, Oct 26, 2018.

  1. BenSi

    BenSi Well-Known Member

    I purchased this coin at auction believing it was misattributed, It was not a John III Vatatzes but a John II Komnenus. Why? Because the portrait reminded me of the other coins I own of John II.

    Now when studying the coin in the web I found out three rulers issued this coin all based on its originators (John II). Why would the Latin empire then John III imitate a coin of a ruler dead 50 years before? Perhaps simply because His gold coins were trustworthy and without critics.

    I read several sources for information in an attempt to prove my coin was an official Constantinople issue of John II and not of John III Vatatzes, after reading published catalogs, academic articles I was left with a sincere form of doubt these coins can be attributed visually. However most of the literature discusses the Thessalonica issue not the Constantinople issue, the difference seems to be squat characters and smaller but thicker flans, the plates in the articles and books make this difficult in some cases to tell the difference.

    According to Pagona Papadopoulou The only way certain is metal analysis, the 12th century coins were 20 ½ carats the later imitators were only 18 carats. I have not tested the coin as of yet, as usual I am lacking the time to do so soon.

    But here is my example,

    32mm slightly flat

    4.38gm

    A3.jpg
    My last read on the subject” John II Komnenos Emperor of Byzantium In the Shadow of Father and Son.” The final chapter is on coinage by Pagona Papadopoulou , in it , she cites an excellent paper by Eleni Lianta that is on Academia. It is 50 pages and has a comparison of pieces that are part of museum collections.

    https://www.academia.edu/35195487/J...erpyra_of_John_II_from_those_of_John_III_.pdf

    I am just beginning with the gold coinage of this time period my knowledge is limited, so if you can add to it with your own experience dealing with this coinage it would be appreciated.
     
    David@PCC, chrsmat71 and Valentinian like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Milesofwho

    Milesofwho Omnivorous collector

    From a quick search, John III's look more cramped than the one you have. I would agree with the John II attribution. I never noticed how the designs are similar until now though. Neat! Alas, all of them are too expensive for me.
     
    BenSi likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page