Morgans are big coins. You put them in bags and the can really scar each other. And the more that the bags are moved (inventory time) the more scarring that occurs. That's what so many of the GSA Morgans are -61 or -62. But a true -60 has to be a REAL wreck -- but still uncirculated.
I said that OP's '60' was too baggy to grade higher. OP then stated he would start a thread with baggy examples grading higher.
Maybe it's not clever to show a PL coin ccfanetic........Still has enough eye appeal to irritate some people with the intense of Your Post
furham, posted: "All Morgan Dollars are "baggy" to a point. I have no problem with the grade here>" Of course this must be an exaggeration just to make a point. Many MS-64's and virtually all MS-65's and higher dollars are not "baggy." The grade of MS-60 is hardly ever used anymore. The coin is graded correctly.
I "resemble" that... It was not my intent to "irritate" anyone. I wanted to make a point and I made it. Case closed.
"resemble" #2... And I was not trying to be "clever" nor was my post "intense." I stated the facts, nothing more.
Sorry ccfanetic, my Post Should Not be unpolite. I Like Your threat, but the coin was too attractive.
I too like CC coins in almost any condition, hence I'm cc fanetic. Take a look at ATS on some great looking p001 cc dollars. Btw, it is my threaD, it is NOT my threaT.
