Authentic?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Kentucky, May 11, 2016.

  1. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    "I get by with a little help from my friends"

    Authentic? front2.jpg back2.jpg
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2016
    stevex6, chrsmat71, Bing and 6 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ancientone

    ancientone Well-Known Member

    Looks legit to me.
     
    Kentucky and TIF like this.
  4. swish513

    swish513 Penny & Cent Collector

    It's not my area of collecting, but nothing jumps out to me to call it fake.
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  5. Alegandron

    Alegandron "ΤΩΙ ΚΡΑΤΙΣΤΩΙ..." ΜΕΓΑΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ, June 323 BCE

    Curious: Weight (g), and diameter (mm), also, would you be able to take a pic of it on edge? (Checking for any casting seam...)

    So far it looks pretty good... let's check the specs...

    Andrew McCabe shows a pic of this as Crawford 387/1 (Sear 318) struck in 77 BCE as L Rutilius Flaccus as moneyer... I am not an expert by any means, but this is how I start chasing down info.
    upload_2016-5-11_18-33-15.png
     
    chrsmat71, Bing, Kentucky and 2 others like this.
  6. Alegandron

    Alegandron "ΤΩΙ ΚΡΑΤΙΣΤΩΙ..." ΜΕΓΑΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ, June 323 BCE

    This one is in my collection:

    upload_2016-5-11_18-41-42.png
    Roman Republic
    L. Rutilius Flaccus. 77 B.C.
    AR denarius (17.8 mm, 4.09 g, 7 h).
    Rome mint.
    OBV: FLAC, helmeted head of Roma right
    REV: L · RVTILI in exergue, Victory, holding wreath and reigns, driving galloping biga right.
    REF: Crawford 387/1; Sydenham 780; RSC Rutillia 1
     
    stevex6, chrsmat71, Bing and 4 others like this.
  7. Mikey Zee

    Mikey Zee Delenda Est Carthago

    Looks legit to me....and even a 'fish-hook' bankers mark for emphasis...
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  8. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Just says 4.0 g
     
  9. Alegandron

    Alegandron "ΤΩΙ ΚΡΑΤΙΣΤΩΙ..." ΜΕΓΑΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ, June 323 BCE

    It is a little heavy for this time, but in tolerance. I think everything looks ok. The bankers mark looks legit. Any seam when looking on edge? Otherwise, personally, it looks legit to me from the photo.
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  10. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

  11. red_spork

    red_spork Triumvir monetalis

    Looks good to me. Weight is within expected range, style is good, I see no signs of toning and the big hook banker's mark is extremely sharp and would not be translated so well if the coin was a cast, even a relatively high quality cast can't generally transfer a banker's mark so sharply. So I think it's absolutely authentic.
     
    Kentucky likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page