Aurelian celebrates his victory over Palmyra

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by seth77, May 23, 2020.

  1. seth77

    seth77 Well-Known Member

    This is an extremely ugly coin and, at the same time, a rather scarce and, I think, historically important issue:


    U8077F1NHOOUOYF.JPG

    AE24mm 3.49g pre-reform radiate
    IMP AVRELIANVS AVG; radiate, cuirassed bust r.
    VICTORIA AVG; Trophy of arms (helmet left); on each side, a bound and sitting captive in oriental dress.
    C*
    BNC p.417; RIC V-1 354, RIC Online #2948 very scarce, 6specs recorded, none in La Venera, reverse die-match w/ London (1979 3-1-19), 1st officina of Cyzicus mint, summer 272AD.

    By the summer of 272, Palmyra had been subdued and Zenobia and Vabalathus were on the run, soon to be captured trying to cross the Euphrates and brought to face judgement in Emesa by August. With Palmyra under Aurelian's control, Egypt secured and the eastern border safe, Antioch and Alexandria started minting (again) for him alone -- with Antioch introducing the RESTITVTOR ORBIS series and Alexandria following through and marking Aurelian's 4th year in August 272.

    It was at this time that the mint of Cyzicus re-introduced the tropaeum type, which had been used to mark Claudius II's Gothic victories (including the Battle of Naissus) in 269. The type possibly started as early as the fall of Palmyra or as late as Aurelian's return trip in September-October 272 and included the well-known design of the tropaeum of arms, but with a twist: it was flanked on each side by Oriental captives -- likely alluding to the capture of Zenobia.

    The issue was apparently short-lived, between the RESTITVT ORIENTIS types (spring to summer before defeating the Palmyrene Revolt) and the new IOVI CONSER and FIDES MILITVM types (autumn, after his victories in the East but probably before his campaigns in Europe against the Carps and him becoming Carpicus Maximus), and had a limited circulation in the general area of Western Anatolia - Eastern Balkans. Its absence from La Venera is also a sign of a localized coinage or/and of a very small issue.

    Was it too nostalgic for Aurelian's interest?
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2020
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Mat

    Mat Ancient Coincoholic

    I don't find it ugly, I think it's pretty cool, especially for it's history. Congrats.
     
    7Calbrey and NicholasMaximus like this.
  4. seth77

    seth77 Well-Known Member

    Thank you, it seems we are likely to see treasure in the most unlikely conditions.
     
  5. ominus1

    ominus1 Well-Known Member

    ..rare historical coins are always interesting! great write up and coin Seth...too nostalgic?....idk...fodder for debate tho.:)...his coin is about the only one in my collection to still have silverwash..he is a most interesting emperor at a most interesting time..his wife is the only gal to be thought to have been sole emperor after his death for a time.. kbaby eats Aurlieian silverwash antiochos ll lyre 004.JPG kbaby eats Aurlieian silverwash antiochos ll lyre 005.JPG
     
  6. seth77

    seth77 Well-Known Member

    Looks like a very difficult piece to photograph.
     
    ominus1 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page