Are fingerprints a negative when buying a coin?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Pickin and Grinin, Feb 24, 2022.

?

Do you find fingerprinted coins attractive?

  1. YES

    7 vote(s)
    12.5%
  2. NO

    40 vote(s)
    71.4%
  3. Depends on the coin

    9 vote(s)
    16.1%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    This one showed up in my pocket the other day.
    It has an interesting enough look and tone to be a keeper. Maybe even a paper envelope.
    Do you find any fingerprinted coins attractive?
    Feel free to post any fingerprinted coin that is in your collection.
    upload_2022-2-24_12-16-32.jpeg
    upload_2022-2-24_12-16-50.jpeg
     
    MIGuy, green18, ominus1 and 1 other person like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Personally, I cannot stand fingerprints on coins in any degree.
     
  4. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    You avoid fingerprints whenever you can. Most collectors don't like them. It's the reason why you are told to handle coins as little as possible, and only by the edges.

    I made an exception for this Columbian Half Dollar because it came in one of the packages of issue at that time. This was not an official package; just one of the holders that was used at the time.

    1892 Columbian Expo pouch.jpg 1893 Columbian pouch O.jpg 1893 Columbian pouch R.jpg
     
    MIGuy, PamR, Ronald J Dawley and 4 others like this.
  5. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I like it!
     
    ominus1 and johnmilton like this.
  6. ominus1

    ominus1 Well-Known Member

    ..me2! :)..i had a ancient Trajan denarius that had i reckon the last persons fingerprints on it and i thought was kool as heck!...JAZ has it now...:)
     
    Lueds and Pickin and Grinin like this.
  7. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    The thread title asked about "negativity" but the lead-in text to the poll asked about "attractiveness". Those can be and often are different things. I chose attractiveness as an aesthetic as the criteria so I voted no. I cannot think of a circumstance where I would find a fingerprint attractive. Now, if I could be certain that the fingerprint on a 1792 half disme was that of TJ or GW or AH, then I would find the coin desirable and the fingerprint not a negative but a positive. That coin would be "attractive" not in an aesthetic sense but rather in a historical/rarity/uniqueness sense.
     
    fiddlehead, KBBPLL, Lueds and 3 others like this.
  8. John Burgess

    John Burgess Well-Known Member

    depends on the coin, some coins are rare enough to find (and I mean like varieties not necessarily those elite few coins that are inaccessible) a fingerprint can be overlooked. if it's the only problem I think... it's not a deal breaker at least.

    I wouldn't say it's "attractive" I'd say, there's situations where if it's the only issue, I could live with it and not be bothered by it, but apples to apples if there's a coin without a fingerprint available at the same time, I'd go for the one without it.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  9. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Ya know every coin will eventually tone due to the environment.
    I completely agree that fingerprints on most coins are a straight up negative.
    There are a few that I like, and the coin has to be a strait grade with unusual toning.
     
  10. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I think that is exactly why fingerprinted coins recieve an MS grade. Technically they are a sign of circulation. The print has altered the surface. But because the market has made them acceptable, the collectors are willing to buy them as a hole filler.
     
    John Burgess likes this.
  11. Jim Dale

    Jim Dale Well-Known Member

    I avoid fingerprints on any coin, even the ones in my pocket. Anyway, most of the coins in circulation aren't worth keeping, so I put them in my wife's coin jar.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  12. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I find fingerprints generally a detraction on a coin.
     
    Pickin and Grinin and Two Dogs like this.
  13. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    No, I do not! My choice only, Thanks for asking.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  14. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    As a general rule, I can't stand them, but I will state that sometimes the toning effect is rather attractive (as illustrated by Pickin' & JM above :) ).
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  15. 1865King

    1865King Well-Known Member

    I avoid fingerprints if at all possible. They are a form of corrosion and cannot be removed. I've seen coins in high mint state & proof grades (65, 66 & 67) with fingerprints on them and don't know why they weren't knocked down a grade or two because of the fingerprints alone.

    However, sometimes they can be minor and be OK but, it would have to be a very scarce coin for me to open my wallet.
     
    Bones-65 and Pickin and Grinin like this.
  16. John Anthony

    John Anthony Ultracrepidarian

    In circulated grades, perfectly fine. After all, coins are meant to be handled.
     
    MIGuy and Pickin and Grinin like this.
  17. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I’ve found coins with fingerprints that are good keepers but I find that fingerprint annoying so I spend them.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  18. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

    Fingerprints are certainly a visual distraction and my eye is drawn to them instantly, so for me, they lessen the value and my desire to buy one. -PMD-
     
    Pickin and Grinin, Hookman and Lueds like this.
  19. Heavymetal

    Heavymetal Supporter! Supporter

    A negative when I’m buying
    A positive when I’m selling
     
  20. Lueds

    Lueds Well-Known Member

    Generally do NOT like them, and, as mentioned above, a very distracting form of damage imo
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  21. Skyman

    Skyman Well-Known Member

    As of most things in life, it depends... Most times they are distracting and unattractive. Having said that, there are also some that IMO add to the attractiveness of the coin. Here's a Franklin I no longer own, but enjoyed the look and kept it for 10 - 15 years.

    sc1949_65FR.jpg
    sc1949_65FRrev.jpg
     
    MIGuy, Pickin and Grinin and green18 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page