Anyone else tired of cookie cutter PR68-70 CAM/DCAM for every U.S. proof coin minted these days?

Is anyone else tired of all U.S. mint proof coinage being basically CAM/DCAM's? I mean I wish the frost wasn't the 'snakeskin' look for one thing, but overall I find them pretty boring. I think I'd enjoy it more if there was some thrill in the hunt again and proof coins came like the late 60's with some variety. Where some would have cameo's, some would be mirrored and others would just be very nice looking basic proofs. Maybe it would work to spice up proof set sales and modern proof coinage in general by offering any sort of variety besides cookie cutter PR68-70 CAM/DCAM for basically every coin minted.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

It would definitely be interesting and make looking through proof sets more worthwhile. It would stink to be the one that ordered a ton of proof sets at mint issue price and end up with all non-cameo coins (especially if the market priced them below issue price right away). However, it could spike sales for people chasing the better cameos.

The closest I've seen to this phenomenon involves the 1 oz proof platinum coins (mainly the obverse with the Statue of Liberty). They all still get graded dcam but if you look at the 2014, 2015, and 2016 coins, they all have a weaker cameo than the earlier dates.

 

I like burnished eagles better than proofs so I would like some variety. I would like it if the mint offered more strike types. Not random quality though.

 

Well, go to an auto parts store and buy rubbing compound. Use it on your CAM/DCAM proofs. Voila! No more cookie-cutter look.

Cal

 

It sounds funny to me that people are now complaining that the Mint makes the coins too well!

When will people be happy???

 

If the mint made proof coins in the quality like they did in the late 70's early 80's I wouldn't mind so much. But they have continually lowered the relief since then and now the frost consists of the laser etched snake skin appearance which simply doesn't look good. All the mints improvements have been done for cost reasons for the mint not to make better coins for collectors. The mint had the quality figured out in the 80's, since then they've only made the coins look worse. The really sad thing is the mint simply doesn't care anymore imo.

Edit to add these photos I found demonstrating the frost change. Does anyone really think it looks better now?

 

I don't. They kind of over did everything which makes every proof look like it has big defects in my opinion. I don't think they should go back to the old only some are cam, but toning it down a notch and doing some different finishes like other world mints do would be a nice change of pace.

 

The photo really shows how things have changed. I hate the most recent version of "cameo"....