Any thoughts on this one 2000 D dime No clad???

I'm keeping it anyway..LOL

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Looks clad to me. It just looks environmentally damaged.

 

If you like it, keep it, but don't buy into that nonsense from the other thread. I'd love to be wrong, but that fellow wasn't doing you any favors.

 

Did I miss a thread?

 

Hi, Newbie here. Can anyone give info about any of these Kennedy's that I found at banks this week?

 

That's why I'm asking. One man's words are words, several people's words are a voice...
Thank you

 

Please start a new thread about your coins so that you do not hijack someone else's thread.

 

He's talking about thread you posted this same coin in and they told you it was possibly one of a kind because of the clashed die marks on it. Like I remarked die clashes as weak as these are pretty common on Roosevelt dimes while they are cool to find they don't really bring a premium.

 

1996=gold plated/2001=business strike circulated/2006=damaged proof/1996=toned business strike. None really worth holding on to because of the circulation damage.

 

Now I see the other TWO threads about this coin.

 

Okay, Just looking for info, didn't mean to ruffle any feathers, My Bad
Thank you all for your tolerance

 

No problem and feathers here aren't ruffled but I just figured you hadn't read the post on the other threads.

 

Also if your pictures were rotated it might be easier for you to see what is being described to you.

 

No feathers ruffled here either. There is nothing about this coin that would command a premium though.

 

You did no such thing.

 

Is this better? I can't determine how this pic is going to turn out, or in which direction.. Sorry

 

Sorry, New here. I'll start new thread. My Bad

 

I want to thank you all for being so tolerant to all the newbies, and me

 

BonnieSue-

You ask questions honestly, so of course we're tolerant. Given the new pictures, I still think it's just environmental damage.