Since I got a young head caracalla for cheap I couldnt not have Geta too. Its a common type but I liked this and it was affordable. Thought this coin might have gotten lost in the mail for but thankfully it arrived. Geta (209 - 211 A.D.) AR Denarius O: L SEPTIMIVS GETA CAES, draped bust right. R: FELICITAS TEMPOR, Felicitas standing left holding caduceus and cornucopia. Rome 198 - 200 A.D. 2.7g 18mm RIC IV 95, RSC III 44, BMCRE V 144
I assume its Rome, is it Laodicea? Doug or Bill, do you know? I only own one Laodicea and its Plautilla so I dont know the style of Laodicea all that much. It was bought as Rome mint too.
Martin and Doug certainly know more about Severan mints than I, but I'd agree with Laodicea. I find Barry Murphy's collection extremely helpful for determining mint: http://bpmurphy.ancients.info/severan/severanhome.htm
Looks to be Laodicea afterall, Cool. That makes this coin my second Laodicea then. Thanks for the clarifications Bill & Martin.
I know mine is not as nice but do those of you with an opinion agree it is Rome mint? While there are many stylistic variations that can point one way or the other, the OP reverse has a short and stubby figure common to the East.
Doug, Your coin has the refinement of engraving on the reverse that I find the easiest dictinction between the two mints. The reverse is much better executed whilst that Laodicea reverses tend to be more cartoon-like and more chubby.
Very nice, I've been wanting to get into some ancient collecting, but still trying to figure out exactly where to start.
Sweet new Geta-addition, Mat (congrats) => here is my only Geta offering ... Geta. As Caesar, AR Denarius AD 198-209 Struck under Septimius Severus, AD 199-204 Rome mint Diameter: 18 mm Weight: 3.36 grams Obverse: Bareheaded and draped bust right Reverse: Castor standing slightly left before horse, holding bridle and scepter Reference: RIC IV 6; RSC 12