An interesting and possibly rare Roman provincial bronze of Otacilia Severa

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by robinjojo, Nov 21, 2023.

  1. robinjojo

    robinjojo Well-Known Member

    This is a coin that I purchased purely for the reverse. I don't really collect Roman provincial coins on any systematic basis, but instead on what attracts me to a particular coin.

    Otacilia Severa, 244-249 AD, AE 27, Coele-Syria, Damascus. Astarte on reverse.
    17.55 grams

    D-Camera Ocacilia Severa AE 27 Coele-Syria, Damascus Tyche-Astarte 244-49AD 17.55g 11-21-23.jpg

    Despite the coin's rough surfaces the reverse is pretty well defined, with Astarte seated above, facing left, with five figures giving homage, one to the immediate left and four more below, something of a Astarte fan club I'd guess.

    Astarte is an interesting female deity, worshipped in the East, notably in Syria, but in other regions as well. Originally a Canaanite and Phoenician deity, her worship became associated with fertility, sexuality, war and hunting, spanning from the Bronze Age to the Classical period. While this coin well post dates the latter period, it is clear that Astarte continued to play an important religious role in Syria, well into the period of the Roman Empire.

    For more information about Astarte, here's a link.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astarte

    Edit: I looked this coin up on the RPC website, something I probably should have done first, rather than relying on the dealer's description, and found this information:

    RPC Volume VIII

    Unassigned ID 26755

    "For the reverse, in upper register, Fortuna seated l., on rock, holding fillet or diadem and cornucopia; in upper l. field, ram leaping l., head r.; before, Marsyas standing r., holding wineskin and raising hand; in lower register, four Tychai: the outer pair with hands raised towards Fortuna of Damascus; l. of centre figure holding up uncertain object; r. of centre figure sacrificing over altar."

    There are 11 examples of this type, six of which are in the core collections.

    So, does the reverse depict Astarte or Fortuna? The leaping ram, quite obscure on this coin, is an interesting element and one that I would not associate with Fortuna. Besides, Astarte is a far more interesting goddess!
     
    Last edited: Nov 21, 2023
    Ancient Aussie, expat, Curtis and 5 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. GinoLR

    GinoLR Well-Known Member

    You can be sure the deity seated above is Fortuna, not Astarte. She wears a turreted crown and under her feet you can distinguish the typical river-god swimming. This Tyche (that's Greek for Latin Fortuna) sitting on a rock above a swimming river god is a copy of the Tyche of Antioch, like many Tyches of other Syrian, Mesopotamian and Cilician cities. The leaping ram looking backwards is also a symbol usually associated with the Tyche of Antioch, but it is present with the Tyche of Damascus as well. The little Marsyas is the statue of Marsyas on the Roman Forum, near which citizenship was granted to freedmen and newcomers. It symbolizes the Jus Italicum being given to the colonia of Damascus.

    Astarte is rarely represented as a woman. Like many semitic deities (Yahweh, Allah, even Muhammad), it was forbidden (or just avoided) to give her an anthropomorphic aspect. Do you know many statues or reliefs of the Roman period showing Astarte? I don't. She was the goddess of Sidon, and since the Achemenid Empire in the 5th c. BC the coins of Sidon represented her through her title ("Sidonian Goddess"), her galley, a spherical baetyl in its cart. Some numismatists assimilate Astarte and Tyche, and think the Tyche of Sidon, with her turreted crown, must be Astarte. It's a possibility, but it's a Tyche in the first place...

    upload_2023-11-22_12-49-38.png
    Elagabalus, Sidon, AE 19 mm. The Baetyl of Astarte in its cart.

    upload_2023-11-22_12-51-20.png
    Sidon, pseudo autonomous under Domitian :
    Obv. Veiled head of Tyche r., star and aphlaston in r. field
    Rev.: ΣΙΔΩΝΟΣ ΘΕΑΣ, ΗϘΡ (above), ΑϚ (below), galley, l. (AD 87/8)
     
    paschka, robinjojo, Bing and 2 others like this.
  4. robinjojo

    robinjojo Well-Known Member

    Thanks!
     
  5. Curtis

    Curtis Well-Known Member

    Actually 26775: https://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/type/26775

    Don't feel bad about mistaking Astarte for Fortuna... Lindgren & Kovacs (2388) made the same error AND thought it was Tyre:

    20231125_145509.jpg

    Note: that specimen cited in the RPC entry, but w/ corrected mint & description.

    Can't really blame Lindgren & Kovacs. They were writing 40 years ago when there were very few references on Roman Provincials, so it was the first of its type & most extensive reference for Greek/RPC bronzes by far.

    I always check how older authors referenced my coins & try to trace how those attributions changed over time. Gives an interesting additional dimension to each coin's ID.
     

    Attached Files:

    robinjojo likes this.
  6. robinjojo

    robinjojo Well-Known Member

    Thank you all for the corrections. It is a fascinating coin with a very "eastern' character.
     
    Curtis likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page