a thin nickle... help please

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by chocho, May 14, 2006.

  1. chocho

    chocho Senior Member

    Here is a small nickle
    It's a 1962, it has a different color, more of a flat slate gray, kind of like a war nickle would have.
    It's a little smaller in size, (as in not as big around) and it is a lot thinner.
    The weight on my scale is 4.7 as in a reg. nickle is 5.1 ( it said in the red book it should be 5.0 but my scales says it's 5.1)
    I have pictures that show it pretty well.. Would someone please tell me if this is an error, and if not..what is it?
    Thanks...:smile
     

    Attached Files:

    • 1.jpg
      1.jpg
      File size:
      89.9 KB
      Views:
      290
    • 2.jpg
      2.jpg
      File size:
      85.3 KB
      Views:
      281
    • 3.jpg
      3.jpg
      File size:
      39.7 KB
      Views:
      231
    • 4.jpg
      4.jpg
      File size:
      48.7 KB
      Views:
      250
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. CoinKid52

    CoinKid52 Senior Member

    I'm not an error expert, but the obverse looks worn. I don't know how likely it is for the actual coin to be worn down. Sorry I can't help.
     
  4. chocho

    chocho Senior Member

    Im not sure what it is..but I don't think it's smaller because it's worn.. I have them much older and worn much more, and still their size is the same.. but thanks so much for looking... have a Great Day..:)
     
  5. Mikjo0

    Mikjo0 Numismatist

    Simple wear wouldn't account for that much thickness and weight difference but I can't tell you what would.Very interesting!Any opinions??
     
  6. CoinGremlin

    CoinGremlin New Member

    Can you show us the edge of normal and this one to compare thickness? While the coin is worn, doesn't look worn enough to be considerably thinner. Wonder about wrong planchet? It also has a lot more wear than a nickel coin of that age, I think. Wrong metal?
     
  7. Mikjo0

    Mikjo0 Numismatist

    CG...I think he already has.The thicker one in his pics is a 1970.
     
  8. CoinGremlin

    CoinGremlin New Member

    OK. Well it's almost 9 here, and I hadn't done anything stoopid yet, so there you are. LOL
    Gosh, I really wonder about wrong planchet, but I am no expert.
     
  9. chocho

    chocho Senior Member

    Hi guys.. just come by to check, thanks for all your opinions. well it looks to be a different metal.. it's dark.. not the silver color of other nickels.
    Well I'll be back later.. maybe someone will see it and say..hey..I know what that is.. grins..
    Thanks Everyone for looking...
     
  10. Captainkirk

    Captainkirk 73 Buick Riviera owner

    It is only missing .3 in weight, so I don't think it's a dime planchet, although it seems to be the right color for silver. Possibly a different silver planchet? More educated error enthusiasts will post soon.
     
  11. mikediamond

    mikediamond Coin Collector

    It looks like both faces have been buffed down. It's not natural wear and it's not a weak strike. The convex edge and abnormally small diameter are definitely signs of post-strike alteration. Conclusion: Not an error.
     
  12. mwmx54

    mwmx54 New Member

    it almost looks like it got stamped one too many times, also, does it look any bigger diameter-wise?
     
  13. chocho

    chocho Senior Member

    why the different color?
     
  14. Gusmyster

    Gusmyster Member

    I agree with Mike. I have a similar nickel that was likely altered with some sort of acidic concoction and it displays similarities to your coin.
     
  15. jmpearso

    jmpearso New Member

    Do you have a caliper? Measure it and the reg coin, could be an illusion with the rounded edges.....Just my .02
     
  16. happycobra

    happycobra Senior Member

    It looks pitted to me, like it was sand, bead blasted or maybe put in an industrial part tumbler.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page