5 Reichspfennig "G" Mint 1938 : Request for Expert Assist

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Dilip.Nair, Jul 22, 2013.

  1. Dilip.Nair

    Dilip.Nair New Member

    Hi All,

    I looking for expert advice on a Third Reich coin that I purchased recently from eBay. The reason I ask for your assistance is because the coin has an unusually high surface lustre. I have compared the metrics of the coin on this site against mine and I see some differences. I hear that there are a lot of Chinese imitiataions of Nazi coins these days that are almost undetectable, lazer cut and casted ones

    I just want to know what is the acceptable standared deviation in weight, diameter and thickness for the coin in discussion. Below I present my Coin's Stats




    * Deno : 5 Reichpfennig ( 0.05 Mark )
    * Dated : 1938
    * Color : Goldish - with very small green corrosion in corner ( I hear the alloy is bronze aluminium, but have no idea how that alloy corrodes )
    * Weight : 2.52 g ( As aginst 2.53 g as quoted on this site)
    * Dia : 19-20 mm ( As aginst 18 mm as quoted on this site)
    * Thick : 1.1-1.2 mm ( As aginst 1.42 mm as quoted on this site)
    * Edge : Vertical rims

    PS : I know that these are cheap coin and commands no numismatic value, but still it is quite intolerable to be cheated from a site like eBay.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    I'd say the weight is within range, Thickness is meaningless on a struck coin Thickness measured where? And thickness of the struck coin is a function of the striking pressure. Oddly the higher the pressure the thicker the coin. The diameter though is well outside of tolerance. Being struck in a collar I would expect the tolerance on the diameter t0 be about .03 mm not 1 to 2 mm
     
  4. Dilip.Nair

    Dilip.Nair New Member

    Rim to Rim Thickness. And as for the Diameter I am not able to accurately measure it as I dont have a caliper , I am using a common mm Ruler measuring the length between the farthest tangents, May not be super accurate but the measurements are fairly correct
     
  5. sonlarson

    sonlarson World Silver Collector

    I see nothing that concerns me. Coin might have been cleaned, hard to tell from the pics. I don't think the Chinese would spend time making a coin worth $5 to $10. Weight is fine and I would remeasure the diameter. It might be actually closer. Nice coin.
     
  6. Numismat

    Numismat World coin enthusiast

    I've been hunting counterfeits for years and never heard of copies of these coins, which generally are worth only a few dollars. Overall the coin looks ok, though maybe dipped in cleaning solution.
     
  7. Dilip.Nair

    Dilip.Nair New Member

    I think, It may be a case with Cleaning. And since I posted this Query, The luster on the surface has degraded considerably. Which might suggest some sort of solvent being used

    Thanks All,
     
  8. sonlarson

    sonlarson World Silver Collector

    Here's a pic of my 1938-J to compare yours to. 18mm and 2.58g. Diameter is correct but weight a little more. Still in tolerance.
    1938J Germany 5 Reichspfennig.jpg

    Also a lot more wear.
     
  9. Dilip.Nair

    Dilip.Nair New Member

    "Also a lot more wear." Thats what is baffeling me the most. A low deno coin like 5 Pfennig should have changed a lot of hands and should show lot more wear. Mine is like it was in Hitler's pocket from the day it was minted, Almost No significant surface wear .

    I see the Eagle's Head is more pronunced in yours. Mine looks like it is a Pigeon's Head

    I guess I ll have to live with it, If it is a counterfeit

    Thanks a Ton Eveyone, For all your Insights
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page