Isn't that what everyone gets when they click on the thumb? I thought using thumbs saved bandwidth from reloading the photo over and over every time, especially those huge files and some threads that you go back to many times. Or should I post them full size? What does the forum prefer?
Darn if you didn't actually find a good one . I am pretty sure this is the most valuable one for 2011 I got one back in 2011 from pocket change in Indiana. then when I come home I learned that folks were finding them left and right there in Indiana. I still have the one I got in change and I have never found one here in Ky. where I live. congrats on finding the doubled die.
Thanks everyone. This made me thing of the incusive DD thing. Here are the initials, and they show that VD type smear, as we all expected, right?
you might be better off to stay away from that microscope for a while or you may start to see little men or something scary.
I actually had a really tiny bug crawl on a coin under the loupe, was way kool - came in view antennae first
But seriously, it is not about the magnitude of the errors, but the accurate diagnosis, wouldn't you agree?
yes but be careful you may over diagnose and start seeing things that are not there . if things are not visible under a 10x loupe then it's probably worthless anyway , we have to give the mint employees a little room to play .