1995 D DDO?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Jim Johns, Apr 20, 2016.

  1. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

    Hi again everyone. Still new to the Lincoln Cents, especially errors, so any info is good knowledge. I searched coppercoins and Coneca for this one, and the markers are there to indicate a possibility. What do the pros think? IMG_20160419_235821.jpg IMG_20160419_235908.jpg IMG_20160420_000025.jpg IMG_20160420_000058.jpg IMG_20160420_000411.jpg IMG_20160420_000822.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. lincoln

    lincoln Large Member

    I like the doubling in the date. Especially because the doubling changes, the distance between the number and its double, as you work toward the outside of the coin. Better pictures needed.
     
    Jim Johns likes this.
  4. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

    Ya it's tricky at the moment. I'm unfortunately working with a magnifying glass and my phone for the night. Its MS state flame red/blue toned as well which doesn't help..not that I'm complaining! Any suggestions on getting better photos?
     
  5. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

  6. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

    Now that I'm looking at pictures, it looks to be a ddr as well maybe? IMG_20160420_005511.jpg
     
  7. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

  8. tomfiggy

    tomfiggy Well-Known Member

    It is not a doubled die. It is incuse die deterioration doubling. Worth one cent. Here are some examples I photographed while searching. 87Dincuse.jpg 89Dibncuse.jpg 89Dincuse.jpg 92incuse.jpg 1990incuse.jpg
     
  9. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

    Your pics seem to be clearly..engraved for lack of a better word? You can see on the 5 in my first pic of the date that it's raised because of the blue tone dot I think? I could most certainly be wrong, but the O in GOD also seems to be a whole other O under it. I'm not doubting it's not a DD based on my luck, but I wouldn't use incuse to describe it.
     
  10. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

    Are the ones in your pictures not considered any variety of a doubled die Tom? I would think those should count for something lol
     
  11. tomfiggy

    tomfiggy Well-Known Member

    Last edited: Apr 20, 2016
  12. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

    Huh...that's crazy. I'll certainly be holding onto it again either way. It has the die gouge in his neck, doubling on top of his head, front of the vest, and the mark under liberty? Maybe it's not the prized DDO but there's a few variety's that make it worth keeping. Ohwell onto the next 50 rolls.
     
  13. eric6794

    eric6794 Well-Known Member

    +1
     
  14. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

    Im still having trouble thinking INCUSE is what happened here? It's clear as day that the blue in the 5 on the date is running flat along the surface, than raised up over the supposedly INCUSE marks. If it were in fact incuse..it would be dipping into and below the surface of the face, not raising above..correct? Does incuse mean something different with coin terminology? I mean, I'm not arguing it's something besides DD, but it would be easier to understand if it was incuse. I know it's hard to tell most of the time, but luckily the blue tone is a dead giveaway that you may be wrong on that one. No disrespect but simply blaming worn dies would be more understandable than using the term incuse.
     
  15. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

    I know this isn't the most clear picture BC it's zoomed in like crazy from the same picture. Correct me if I'm wrong, but under right under the definite 5 where the double in question meets up, wouldn't the curve of the blue line be inverted as well? It's curving to the right, wrapping AROUND the double. If it were in fact an incuse mark, it would curve inward toward the 9..right? Im just trying to straighten out your definition on what im looking at.. Screenshot_2016-04-20-03-00-33.png Screenshot_2016-04-20-03-00-33.png Screenshot_2016-04-20-03-00-33.png Screenshot_2016-04-20-03-00-33.png
     
  16. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

    Sorry for all the DOUBLE pics lol it wasn't loading. But also in looking at the 5, the bottom of the double would also have the blue tone inverted. Instead of having the rounded outward look, wouldn't it be curved opposite and curving in towards the center?
     
  17. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

    Idk..to me it looks as if it was struck by a worn "bold" die, annealed, then struck again with a working die. Again, I'm just a new guy, but either way, physics tells me I'm 100% correct that it's not incuse, whatever the issue.
     
  18. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    It's not a doubled die. As others have already said, this is caused by a worn die/die deterioration.
     
  19. tomfiggy

    tomfiggy Well-Known Member

    Here is real doubling of a number 5

    Doubledate.jpg
     
  20. ken454

    ken454 Well-Known Member

  21. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    As much as it seems OK to respond to a comment violating rules and sure to be acted upon, it isn't , You will be dinged if you violate any rules in doing so. Just report it, don't respond!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page