1990 D possible RPM!!!

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by jessash1976, Jul 17, 2009.

  1. jessash1976

    jessash1976 Coin knowledgeable

    Check this out! I checked coppercoins.com for a match and they don't have any for that year. I really think it is a D above the other. What do you guys think? Also, didn't they change they way they did MM startiing with this year?
    And actually at these angles you can't see the possible other D. Not sure about that, but will post other pics in min.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    okay, perhaps point to the place where you think you see the RPM.
     
  4. jessash1976

    jessash1976 Coin knowledgeable

    Yes,

    It is right above the original MM. You can see the serifs in the third pic.
     
  5. lincolnhoardr

    lincolnhoardr Coin Hoarder

    I see what Jessah is talking about right above the 9 kinda a ghost D
     
  6. USS656

    USS656 Here to Learn Supporter

    I see what you are talking about but I always get it wrong so I'll let the experts on minting errors weigh in.
     

    Attached Files:

  7. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    Die crack but a small one.
     
  8. jessash1976

    jessash1976 Coin knowledgeable

    here are some better ones. I am going to take some different angles in a bit.
    I don't like the way the bottom gets cut off. Any sugestions?
     

    Attached Files:

  9. rockdude

    rockdude Coin Collector

    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times Roman]Since 1990, the mint mark has been applied directly to the hubs that make the dies, eliminating the hand-punch process that resulted in RPMs.[/FONT]
     
  10. USS656

    USS656 Here to Learn Supporter

    With the different angles it looks like some planchet issues moving out from the rim to the area identified.
     
  11. jessash1976

    jessash1976 Coin knowledgeable

    So what does that mean, there is a possiblity that it could happen like this?
    Do you think I should still send it in for attribution?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page