1986 d penny retained Lamination error

Hello I got 1986 d penny is this retained Lamination error?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

don't think so. Sorry
Retained Lamination Definition : A lamination error occurs when metal flakes off the surface of a coin or planchet. It is generally believed that the flaking, peeling, and cracking is due to impurities in the alloy which causes metal to separate along horizontal planes of weakness.

 

Hi thank you. Your the expert I believe you! What they called this missing letters?

 

I think the call it struck through grease . follow me > https://www.sullivannumismatics.com/information/articles/strike-through-error-coins
https://www.cointalk.com/threads/greased-coins.290970/

 

I am sorry to say but Sal is not an expert.

 

Gee thanks , lol. Ok sir your the expert then I guess
" Expert in Training " Been collecting before you were bornand I have no time for such comments .

 

On the reverse looks struck through grease. I mean the obverse the letter L on Leberty...

 

Lol

 

What ?lol

 

If you want the truth about a coin you can ask paddyman98 I think is his name I'll make sure and get back to you

 

Yes I was correct paddyman98 is who I would ask I have learned alot from this forum and paddyman98

 

oh now I'm lying ? What a terrible thing to say on my B-Day .

 

Happy birthday I wanna give you a hug come here...

 

I believe that sir paddy is very expert too and strict about error and that’s what the new collectors need. There’s a lot of good expert here on CT. Base on what I observed

 

Oh boy.. The Missing L in LIBERTY in looks to be a common Struck Through Grease issue. Since a 1986 is copper plated it is less of a Lamination but definitely some sort of anomaly. What it could be? I'm not totally sure.

Thanks Marites.

I don't like using the word "expert".. A Specialist is a more proper title I use. Unless you are Fred Weinberg or Mike Diamond then you can call yourself an expert! Sorry folks.

 

Miss, I will not promise it is one. It depends if you can see there is an actual raised area. If you look at the 1st full obverse photo, you will notice a very faint line continuing down past where the L should be, but I can't tell for sure.( Noticed Paddy's grease) but it could be a very minor lamination if it is raised and not a surface scratch. You have a good eye. IMO, Jim

 

I totally agree. I see a faint L .

 

Specialist is very good too... okay sir now I know the proper title... thank you so much

 

Just to clarify..
I stated that since it is copper plated it could be less of a Lamination but not that is not at all a Lamination. Many believe that Laminations cannot occur on Copper plated cents. Not totally true.
I have this example of a 1984 copper plated zinc in my collection attributed by NGC
I hope I didn't confuse y'all now

 

Hi sir Jim thank you so much for your time. I will take new clear pictures later after I’m done my exercise...