1985 d Lincoln cent

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Jjpe, Nov 12, 2022.

  1. Jjpe

    Jjpe Well-Known Member

    Good morning, is there similarities in the 1985 and the 1985 d Lincoln Cent with the date and mint mark? The eight and the five on the d look a lot like the eight and the five on the Philadelphia. Is that even possible? There was no 1985 d RPM in variety Vista. In wexlers, there are two 1985 d RPM one going south one going east and both are not as thick as this d. I'm guessing environment smashed it down. On the reverse looks like die deterioration or a lot of Grease filled. Thanks again for the schooling. IMG_20221111_235705113.jpg IMG_20221111_234208158.jpg IMG_20221111_234200794.jpg IMG_20221111_234205459.jpg Screenshot_20221112-000153.png
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Not the same in my opinion. Sorry.
     
  4. Jjpe

    Jjpe Well-Known Member

    Yeah I pretty much knew that myself. But the d still looks funny
     
  5. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Lets end the thought of environment damage.
    ED has to do with corrosion and usually only the toning on a coin. ED can cause surface damage but only porous surfaces and raised deposits that are stuck to the surface.
    The circular damage above the date is damage but not environmental.
    Your coin is simply die deterioration and possibly some split plating.
     
  6. Oldhoopster

    Oldhoopster Member of the ANA since 1982

    Split plating damage appears to be relatively common on cents from the mid 80s.
     
  7. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Looks like it was minted by a tired worn out die.
     
  8. Jjpe

    Jjpe Well-Known Member

    Again I learned something every time I come out here now I just got to retain it thanks I'll Merry Christmas
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page