1970 S DDO Lincoln: Which One?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Puddin'Farts, Mar 30, 2019.

  1. Puddin'Farts

    Puddin'Farts Member

    Hi guys, any help would be much appreciated in identifying which DDO this guy is. It is a proof. I never have much luck with Lincoln's..guess because of the size mixed with my patience for trying to identify Proof Varieties/Errors. I have tried to get the best Photos possible and can try again if anybody can suggest a better lighting technique to help out. The bottom of the 9 is split, the top right of the 7 is split, the top right of the T is split in LIBERTY, the top right of the Y, IMG_20190330_233453.jpg IMG_20190330_233430.jpg IMG_20190330_233349.jpg IMG_20190330_233321.jpg IMG_20190330_233404.jpg IMG_20190330_220604834_HDR.jpg IMG_20190330_220454758.jpg and it looks like there is doubling to the left of the B & E also. I'm pretty much cancelling out the LD/SD only because of the filled Mintmark but I'm not sure. Thanks in advance for any help!
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Clawcoins

    Clawcoins Damaging Coins Daily

    Can we see the *entire* coin in one picture. Like, the entire circular thing ?

    for instance the FS-101 DDO is very noticeable throughout but you are showing everything *except* what is obvious 1970 S DDO examples.

    Unless you have a specific DDO, in which case it would be helpful if you identify it specifically.
     
  4. Puddin'Farts

    Puddin'Farts Member

    Sorry about that I was just first attempting to show the doubling that I noticed. Here are pictures of the coin...the entire circular thing... IMG_20190331_130007.jpg IMG_20190331_130051.jpg
     
  5. Clawcoins

    Clawcoins Damaging Coins Daily

    well the wexler 001/FS-101 has clear doubling in "IN GOD WE TRUST" liberty and the date.
    I don't see it in yours as clearly.

    002 shows spread in IGWT, and a die crack in the L - neither present in yours.

    003 is primarily a hubbing issue seen in the 9 and 0. I don't see it in the 9 at all.
    but I see the extra thickness in the IBERTY

    004 - doubling in the L .. I see a fatter L but no split doubling.

    005 - pics are not clear enough (lighting issue). maybe some class II spreading on the IBE but not the die break between the date/mm

    man .. I just looked up all the minor DDO for this and there a billion of 'em.

    I think it is DDO but I'm not sure which one of the minor ones. Certainly not FS-101 which is the important one.


    FYI, you need to soften your lighting as it has too many bright spots on the coin taking away the needed details.

    maybe @Rick Stachowski can identify it, or think I'm seeing things.
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2019
  6. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    Since it appears the mintmark "S" also has similar effects on it , the odds are very much against a DDO ,and more for mechanical doubling effect ( no value ) that was common in that era in SF.

    Jim
     
  7. Puddin'Farts

    Puddin'Farts Member

    Thanks for taking a minute to look I appreciate it. I saw the same thing with the minors and figured either someone would be into Lincoln's enough to know off hand or it's just another one for the collection.
     
  8. Puddin'Farts

    Puddin'Farts Member

    The S mm to me looks filled, not doubled at all but I see your point. May have been the reflection in the photo. Thanks for the input if it's not a major one I'm not even gonna worry about it anymore
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page