1965 quarter missimg clad on obverse and reverse

quarter mis sing clad layer on obverse and reverse

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

worth 24-3/4 cents or a little more.
unless you get it certified. Then it'd be worth about 25 cents.

 

it's corroded

 

Incorrect.. You have a Quarter with Environmental Damage. A true missing clad layer usually occurs just on one side of a clad coin. Yours is just corroded.
Just damage.

Here is an example from my collection

 

no sir iam pretty sure thier has been coins with both sides missing the layer correct. or would u like me to prove u wrong

 

I have proved you wrong on every other thread and all coins you have posted.. I'm not wasting my time and effort with someone who is not willing to learn.
All your coins are NOT mint errors..
Especially this Quarter in question. 33 years of collecting mint errors I don't need a young smartass to tell me what to do! Nor I need you to prove me wrong

 

A coin with both clad layers missing would be very thin and very light.
Such a coin may exist (unlikely) but yours isn't it. Usually the missing clads is one side only. When the clad layer is missing, the copper is very bright. Here is a member's coin (Chris) with reverse clad layer missing. You can see your coin is just rusted.

And here is a partial missing clad, compare it to your quarter.

 

what up with the reverse is it missing the clad

 

No it is not missing.. The Label says missing clad layer on Obverse.

 

Here are some more from my collection
Only on one side -

 

This coin exhibits environmental damage...not a missing clad layer error.

If you are sure you are correct and do not wish to listen to opinions of other members here yet want to prove us wrong, send your coin to one of the top 4 TPGs (PCGS, NGC, ICG, or ANACS) and show us a picture of the slab that says it's a missing clad layer. I'd expect that none of them will determine this coin has a missing clad error - maybe a Details - Environemntal Damage grade instead.

 

Good Grief Charlie Brown! You should be taking lessons from Shrews. She IS applying herself.

 

That would be fine advice, Tommy.... if only that was his purpose in being here.

This place is nearing the level of political websites regarding the lack of witty and/or remotely amusing trolls.

 

will the brihtness of the copper shine the same after 53 yrs of circulation. i forgot to include one more fact on the thread seen on reverse crack line starts at the top right side of the cross bar of the first 'T' of 'STATES' runs downward across the top of 'A' keeps running down same angle towards bottom of the 2nd 'T' of 'states crosses over the 'T' at the bottom drops downward just missing the top and bottom of 'L' ending up at the top of the second vertical line of letter 'N' of EPLURIBUS UNUM. Still with me crack line continues from under eagles beak the back end of it almost directly under it's eye more to the west just a bit from their line continues threw the wing exiting at 9 o'clock let me know what u think respectfully ymag

 

I have only seen two certified coins with dual missing clad layers. Yong Nag's (mispelling intended) coin is J-U-N-K.

 

You can examine it all you want. Your coin is rusted, corroded, environmentally damaged. It happens all the time.
Missing clad layer is quite rare.
Have you weighed it? If it weighs anywhere close to 5.67 grams, it's not missing a clad layer.

 

thank you for the tip i will get on right away your a scholar and a gentel man highly apppriciate

 

We don’t have to prove you wrong. You are wrong. Period. End of story. And you have worn out this routine.

 

Yes, please do. At this point you making an actual effort to prove anything would be a fine step in the right direction.