1959 D 1c DDO DDR on date Liberty, IGWT, Liberty on rim, America, columns, and building

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by marty priest, Aug 24, 2024.

?

Constructive feedback on validity of any errors would be appreciated.

  1. ddo

    1 vote(s)
    100.0%
  2. ddr

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. marty priest

    marty priest New Member

    SingleShot0021 (2).jpg
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    First go to Variety Vista and look to see if there are DD variations for this date and MM. This coin has some circulation wear and scratches and that can make it harder to see if it is a true DD or one of several types of worthless doubling.
    VV shows 2 obverse DDs for this date. Compare with yours.
    http://www.varietyvista.com/01b LC Doubled Dies Vol 2/DDO 1959-D.htm
    And 1 rev DD: http://www.varietyvista.com/01b LC Doubled Dies Vol 2/DDR 1959-D.htm

    The variety for the reverse only shows the C in CENT. Of course it's always possible that you could have a "discovery coin". But wouldn't it be more likely that someone else would have found the first DDR after 65 years.
    The varieties for the obverse seem to be on the date and on the L in LIBERTY. Your L appears to have been struck by something post mint.
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2024
    marty priest likes this.
  4. marty priest

    marty priest New Member

    Thanks for the info Michael
     
    Michael K likes this.
  5. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    There are a number of posts here with diagrams, to show you what to look for with DDs. And the different types of doubling there are. Try the search box.
     
    marty priest likes this.
  6. marty priest

    marty priest New Member

    Looks like it could be a type 001 ddo
     
  7. marty priest

    marty priest New Member

    hard to know though
     
  8. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    Your coin has die deterioration, strike doubling, PMD and a lot of wear damage to a first-year Memorial cent. There is nothing remaining of value beyond face value.

    With the amount of wear, trying to confirm variety characteristics is almost impossible because the wear damage will have obscured die markers and minimized variety attributes if not totally obliterated them…imo…Spark
     
    marty priest and SensibleSal66 like this.
  9. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    I couldn't have said it better. thumb.gif
     
    Spark1951 likes this.
  10. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    This coin was minted by a worn die. Not a mint error. Keep searching.
     
  11. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    Yes, it is a die deterioration effect. but if a person does goes to VV or similar old
    listings, they will probably see such listed as a "Doubled die". I would only suggest Coppercoins.com as they seem to be the only help area that discarded the old crud and are quite accurate now. IMO of course. Jim
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page