1953 S CENT

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by SmokinJoe, Jul 4, 2023.

  1. SmokinJoe

    SmokinJoe Well-Known Member

    Hey everyone, I was just going through my coin books and noticed a 1953 s cent where
    the S is touching the bottom of the five in " 1953 " ....First time I saw that....And I
    pulled the cent out of the coin wrap,looked at it, and put the coin in the book, and I did not notice it ( Duhhh...) :dead:....( Tough when you get old...Believe me!) Anyways, I am sure this is not the first one of that year....What do you guys think?
    1953 S CENTa.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    Definitely different
     
  4. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    I think it was 1989 when the mintmark was added to the die rather than having the die struck with a punch and hammer at the mint. So there are some that are doubled like D/D or S/S or like yours where MM die hit a little high. Thus there are probably a large number of those.IMO, Jim
     
    SmokinJoe likes this.
  5. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    The Mint cranked out 182 million ‘53-S. At 1 million per die pair, that’s 182 pairs. No telling the average mintage per pair; some were used longer and others shorter. And we don’t know how many dies had the Mint Mark touch the 5.

    The real question is after 70 years: How many have survived?

    And that’s NOW. Fewer will make it going forward. We may never know.

    What I do know is it is interesting and not found frequently. Nice one.
    …imo…Spark
     
    SmokinJoe likes this.
  6. 2Old

    2Old Active Member

    In the PDS system from the "Official Price Guide to Mint Errors" Seventh Edition, it called "II-C-16 Displaced Mintmark (touching another design element)" 53s MM.jpg
     
  7. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    5X on screen, doesn't appear to touch.
     
  8. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    It's out of place, that's high for it.
     
    SmokinJoe likes this.
  9. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Nice but we must remember that the mint mark was hand punched into the die in 1953.
     
    SmokinJoe likes this.
  10. SmokinJoe

    SmokinJoe Well-Known Member

    That's exactly what caught my eye eddiespin!
     
    Heavymetal likes this.
  11. SmokinJoe

    SmokinJoe Well-Known Member

    Your absolutely right Collectingnut, and I am guessing it was a human error, but I just wanted to bring it to everyone's attention that it was higher than it should be.
    But then it probably wasn't necessary for me to mention that in a coin collecting club. ( ok I'll say it to myself, DUUUUUHHHH!!! )
     
    Collecting Nut likes this.
  12. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    You may have unknowingly helped another member by doing so.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page