1953 D/d

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by libertyseated, Mar 14, 2007.

  1. libertyseated

    libertyseated Senior Member

    Ok, Lets try another.
    This was found in a lot of 20 rolls purchased from a local dealer.

    Under my tiny 20x magnifier I spy no break in the vertical line on the "D" to the west. So am I correct to say this is an early die stage of Coneca rpm #002 or did I miss it and instead this is Coneca rpm #001 or FS 021.73
     

    Attached Files:

    • 53d.jpg
      53d.jpg
      File size:
      79.3 KB
      Views:
      172
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    It's not FS 021.73, and all CONECA has is a description so I can't be sure without seeing the rest of the coin. Do the other diagnostics listed in CONECA fit the coin ?
     
  4. Here is a great place to check on these things.

    Great find!

    Michael
     
  5. justafarmer

    justafarmer Senior Member

    It appears to be RPM-002. Nice find.
     
  6. libertyseated

    libertyseated Senior Member

    I did my search on this at the coppercoins web site. I really have no more info than this. I really need to go book shopping ( but that leaves less $$$ for coins ).
     
  7. libertyseated

    libertyseated Senior Member

    The coin is a little worn but I can find none of the markers of the #001 rpm. So it's #002 then

    Thanks all
    Chuck
     
  8. justafarmer

    justafarmer Senior Member

    Don't need makers for this one - look at the location of the Mint Mark in relation to the 5 in the date.
     
  9. Phoenix21

    Phoenix21 Well-Known Member

    Wow, nice find! It also goes to show, you can find neat things like this anywhere. You just need to know how to look. ;)

    Phoenix :cool:
     
  10. libertyseated

    libertyseated Senior Member

    Thanks justafarmer
    It's funny how one can miss the big picture when looking too hard.
     
  11. justafarmer

    justafarmer Senior Member

    When attributing RPMs remember - S-L-O-M - (spread - location -orientation- markers).

    Spread - is the secondary mint mark (north, south, east, west...etc.) of primary mint mark?
    Location - where is the primary mint mark located in relation to other devices on the coin?
    Orientation - is the primary mint mark straight up 12:00 or rotated clockwise or counterclock wise?

    Once you have made the above observations you can attribute 90% of the RPMs. You only need to resort to markers about 10% of the time.

    In some years there are design features that will aid in attribution such as - 1960 Lincoln Cents (Small date, Large date), 1944-S, 1945-S, 1946-S, 1947-S Lincoln Cents (Mint Mark Style), 1982 Lincoln (Copper, Zinc), 1945 Mercury (micro s), 1878 Morgan (Tail Feathers) and etc.

    The above is the standard process - mine is slightly different L-O-S-M (Location, Orientation, Spread, Makers). I take a picture of the RPM and import it into TurboCad then determine location and orientation first. This is all that is needed about 98% of the time. About 2 times out of 100 - I resort to spread - which helps about half the time.

    Unless of course - its an RPM such as originally posted in this thread. It may not be classified as a Cherrypicker - but it certainly is one that is classified as easy-pickens (IMHO).
     
  12. satootoko

    satootoko Retired

    Not really. In the long run the proper books save you more than they cost, by helping you avoid overpaying, or finding true bargains. ;)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page