1946 Nickel D over inverted D?

IDK I'm verklimpt but I think it might be

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Looks more like a die deterioration issue. IMHO

 

Wow ! I'm confused . DD in my opinion also .

 

Is everything that you gaze upon the result of die deterioration mr paddyman. JK

 

Alright Sal

 

No..
Sometimes I see Superman!

 

Wow I think I see him too. You can barely make out the S on his flabby pecs

 

Better yet what do you make of this above Monticello

 

Flying Saucers ?

 

The coin took a few hits. Normal for a coin of this age.

 

Hits? Oh right it took it right on the inverted D every time

 

It's 2 against 2 Sal so we're the victors. Where do I collect my 2 grand?

 

You ask what was above Monticello. Those are hits.

 

Yeah I thought you might be talking about the other comment I made ...my apologies

 

The photos are not clear enough to make a judgement. The five variations listed in
http://varietyvista.com/05 JN RPMs/RPMs 1946D.htm do not match this coin. Enlarged clear photos, in normal orientation, are needed using a light source from north, south, east and west.

 

Sal has more wrong opinions than right opinions. I don't see an RPM either.

Oops! Corrected to RPM instead of OMM.

 

.

So it has to match. That's interesting this 1970 S doesn't match either so what would you call it

 

Honestly, I attempt to make my judgements based upon the best information I can find. Photos that are not clear and crisp do not allow quality responses. I also realize many members do not have the funds to purchase scopes or other devices to take enhanced photos which adds to the difficulty of answering questions.
Now to your question. Poor quality photos render my consideration pointless.

 

+ one on Robert's analogy. Better luck next time.

 

Now, you're trying to compare a Ford to a Chevy. Don't play games!