1944-P/P Jefferson Nickel Premium GEM (Maybe FS) RPM-009

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Lehigh96, Sep 6, 2023.

  1. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I bought this coin on eBay for $11 for the iridescent toning, but was pleasantly surprised by the steps and the very minor RPM. The RPM is very minor and exceedingly hard to photograph, but it looks exactly like the photos from variety vista. Unfortunately, there are no supporting diagnostics and NGC doesn't attribute this variety, but I am still going to submit it hoping for MS66 5FS.

    Photo #1: Coin angled into the direct lighting.

    [​IMG]

    Photo #2: Coin angled away from light to show irisescence.

    [​IMG]

    Photo #3: Steps

    [​IMG]

    Photo #4: RPM-009

    [​IMG]


    Photo #5: Variety Vista photo

    [​IMG]

    Let me know what you think about the RPM attribution, grade, and steps.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Mr. Numismatist

    Mr. Numismatist Strawberry Token Enthusiast

    I don't think it will get 66 with that scratch on the hair line on his forehead, but good luck!
     
  4. TheNickelGuy

    TheNickelGuy Well-Known Member

    I joined that CONECA site just to see if I could get a mm attributed and it turned out to be machine doubling. I guess they are right but nowhere else on the die was machine doubled. NADA.

    Anyway, they were very polite and explained that a mintmark is added onto the die and can have some isolated MD like it did.
    I thought I had a triple punched mintmark. Still it's a neat coin.

    All that has nothing to do with your very nice P/P 1944 Jefferson.
    I would run it by those guys, maybe you have something unlisted and can claim your fame with the discovery.

    Yours is clearly an RPM.

    A very nice nickel there Lehigh!
     
  5. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Have you tried Wexlers?
    He has coneca -004 as WRPM-001
    And shows plenty of die markers.

    I would think that it is a little baggy for a 66, but still if the luster is there than it could go a 66 IMO. My major concern is the light clash that looks like it was abraded on the reverse. That usually holds the grade back.
     
  6. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    The steps are very nice but technically I don't think they are full. Great coin.
    Would need a better photo.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page