Purchased this awhile back for the album and was nicely surprised at the die crack on it that wasn't mentioned in the ad.
Does that make a difference. Guessing rim to rim is a better type of crack. Or is that a die crack cud. I’m sorry
Nice catch. As @paddyman98 stated, it is on its way to becoming a CUD. When the die fails at that point, the piece comes off, it will produce a large CUD, but for now, you have a nice example of a Canadian coin with a die crack.
Pretty neat find. I’m not an error expert and was thinking it may be a retained cud, @paddyman98 confirmed!
When the piece eventually falls off of the Die then there will be a void. When the Die strikes the blank planchet the metal flows into the void which will be the Cud. At the moment it's a Retained Cud or Pre Cud.. Got it?
Not sure that the Canadians call the errors as we do. In the US we call anything rim to rim a retained. In Canada there may be more or less when calling errors. If it was bi level and showed that the area was loose when struck it might be a different story.
It's a "hoof in date" gone wild. I don't find it attributed as such, but there is another example here https://www.coinsandcanada.com/coin...cents-1943&years=50-cents-1937-1952#erreur-13 noted as a "retained broken die." Nice find.
Thank you all for the input. Seems to be a lot of potentially different terms for something like this.
I just knew @paddyman98 was right. I just wanna see what he sees before he tells me what I saw. I would love to get there