1939-D Jefferson nickel

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by borgovan, May 4, 2009.

  1. borgovan

    borgovan Supporter**

    I hate to tease, and I'm not too much of a braggart in general, but I am so geeked about a coin I just got in the mail today.

    I picked up a 1939-D Jefferson nickel in a PCGS MS-67 holder. I am generally skeptical of these things until I see them in hand, but this one is the real deal. It is exactly what I would grade the coin if I saw it raw (and I'm quite the grading stickler.)

    Anyway, back to the teasing part, I don't have pics yet, but I'll bust out the camera soon and share.

    Thanks for listening!
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. jaceravone

    jaceravone Member

    Ahhh Man, you are really teasing us now. We want to see pics!!!! Nice pick up!
     
  4. Mr. Coin Lover

    Mr. Coin Lover Supporter**

    If you are that happy with it then you must have one beautiful coin, congradulations.
     
  5. mgChevelle

    mgChevelle AMERICAN

    I'm happy that your happy with it.
    I CANT wait to see pics.

    congrats!
     
  6. ImTheCrew

    ImTheCrew Go Titans

    must be a beauty congrats!
     
  7. TheNoost

    TheNoost huldufolk

    Pics pics pics!
     
  8. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Is it a Reverse or 38 or 40?
     
  9. the_man12

    the_man12 Amateur Photographer

    What is the difference? I can never find any good info about it...
     
  10. byrd740

    byrd740 Numismatist

    PICS! We want to see it!
     
  11. Speedy

    Speedy Researching Coins Supporter

    that is just downright mean....to tell us, and not post photos :D :D

    Speedy
     
  12. borgovan

    borgovan Supporter**

    It's the reverse of 1940.

    According to Nagengast's book, about 3/4 of this date are reverse of 1940, and the remaining quarter are the reverse of 1938.

    The steps aren't great, but the rest of the strike is very nice. Step count, if I remember correctly, is 5-5-2-3.

    the_man: I know there's a good reference out there with pictures, but I can't find it right now.

    The reverse of 1938 has poorly-defined steps. They look "wavy". If you look at nickels starting in 1940, the steps are straight, and the top step is about double the thickness of the others. That's the difference. The change took place partway into 1939, so some of the nickels were struck with the old reverse, and most were struck with the new, strengthened reverse.
     
  13. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    here is what I can find for you on the 2 different reverses. Q. David Bowers writes in A Guide Book of Buffalo and Jefferson Nickels:

    "reverse of 1938: The steps appear mushy and not clearly defined, even on Proofs. The steps are uneven and wavy and the indentations between the steps vary in depth. There are many bridges present between the raised portions of the steps.

    reverse of 1940: The reverse of 1940, used on Jefferson Nickels through 1967, and with modification 1968-1970, has straight, sharply defined steps. This definition, however progressively deteriorated as the master hub wore. Thus the steps on earlier dates will be sharper and deeper than on later dates."

    hope that helps,

    Noodle
     
  14. houston3204

    houston3204 Numismatic Consultant

    Would like to see...but CONGRATS!!!!!!
     
  15. borgovan

    borgovan Supporter**

  16. byrd740

    byrd740 Numismatist

    That is Awesome!
     
  17. Joshycfl

    Joshycfl Senior Member

    that would make a perfect addition to my collection!
     
  18. the_man12

    the_man12 Amateur Photographer

  19. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    WOW!!! Where did you find it?
     
  20. borgovan

    borgovan Supporter**

    I found it on eBay. It had what I considered to be a good starting price, and no bids down to the last few seconds. I knew I couldn't be the only one watching it, so I placed a reasonable bid with just a few seconds to go. Sure enough, someone else bid at the last minute, but their bid was weak.
     
  21. jaceravone

    jaceravone Member

    Holy Smokes! That is sweet! Nice grab.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page