1935 S Peace Silver $

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by redcent230, Feb 3, 2017.

  1. redcent230

    redcent230 Well-Known Member

    Grade this coin? Yes picture is bad . I shot it from my iPhone
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Mint state total washout..........
     
  4. Camreno

    Camreno Active Member

  5. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 64 ...the reverse looks better than the obverse but it might be the photo...still a nice semi key date
     
    Camreno likes this.
  6. Collect89

    Collect89 Coin Collector

    In that slab the label might state MS-65. Of course that is just my silly wild guess based upon the photos. Getting NGC or PCGS to cross at the same grade might be a challenge. It's a pretty coin.

    Here is my 1935-S with four rays below ONE.
    1935-S Collage.jpg
    1935-S Reverse four rays.jpg
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2017
    green18 likes this.
  7. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

  8. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    63 but that's my grade, not what the slab may say. I hate thumb nails. Wish it was not an option here.
     
  9. mynamespat

    mynamespat Well-Known Member

    Eh, I cheated and looked up the cert. I don't think I would be comfortable deciding between a 63, 64, 65 from Redcent's photos- too much glare and too many pixels being used for the background.
     
  10. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    There's insufficient detail on either face for grading; at least the 1921 has a good-enough reverse image to give me some traction. This is not to demean your photography skills, redcent230 - lustrous silver is as tough as it gets to shoot - but the standard for grading Mint State coins really needs to be higher to avoid garbage-in, garbage-out opinions.
     
  11. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    What's that?
     
  12. mynamespat

    mynamespat Well-Known Member

    The further the coin is from the camera the smoother everything looks because less pixels aren't being used for the actual coin. Sometimes this is taken to an extreme by bad sellers (I see it most often in estate sales listings), where they take the photo from across the room, zoom in to make it to size and crop away excess.
    Thus, I don't think I would gauge a $1k swing based on the photo above since some features could be hidden by this effect. We could grade it on what we know. We know that ICG graded coins often don't meet the standard of PCGS or NGC of the same grade.
     
  13. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    64, though I wish the pic was better.

    Nice one, at any rate. I'd gladly let it fill that hole among my Peace dollars.:D
     
  14. redcent230

    redcent230 Well-Known Member

    Yes sorry I am not much a digital photo person. I might have to invest in that area in the future. The coin looks alot better than this.
     
  15. redcent230

    redcent230 Well-Known Member

    So is it 4 rays worth more than 3 ?
     
  16. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    It's a variety, VAM-3, for the issue. Not particularly uncommon, although his looks to be in a rather uncommon grade. :)
     
  17. Collect89

    Collect89 Coin Collector

    What is the grade on the holder?
     
  18. redcent230

    redcent230 Well-Known Member

  19. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    Another beauty. It never gets old.
     
  20. redcent230

    redcent230 Well-Known Member

    Thank You
     
    Michael K likes this.
  21. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    I'm not surprised. It's a good one. The things I was most worried about in your images were the hair behind the cheek and the detail on the point of the shoulder; these are the two places I look the hardest on Peace Dollars when determining between Circulated and Uncirculated.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page