1932-s WQ Proof on ebay

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Debwests, May 3, 2010.

  1. Debwests

    Debwests Junior Member

    Were any proofs made for this date by chance? (I'm thinking not maybe?) or how many?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Tom B

    Tom B TomB Everywhere Else

    There is no such thing as a 1932-S WQ proof. In fact, the US Mint made no proof US coinage for the years 1917-1935.
     
  4. Debwests

    Debwests Junior Member

    I know that there are copys/replicas to "look" like a proof, ... ok thanks for the info. Much appreciated! ;)
     
  5. Debwests

    Debwests Junior Member

    Very interesting..thank you!
     
  6. Tom B

    Tom B TomB Everywhere Else

    Please let me amend that statement about no proof US coinage to exclude silver dollars and commemorative issues, which were made in very limited numbers during certain years and for certain issues. My initial post was with respect to the traditional one cent through fifty cent proof sets that the US Mint made just prior to 1917 and just after 1935. I hope that was clear.
     
  7. Debwests

    Debwests Junior Member

    I gottcha....thanks!
     
  8. Debwests

    Debwests Junior Member

  9. Numismatist47

    Numismatist47 New Member

    That's a copy. You'll also notice under the Ask Seller a Question link, is a link to the Maryland Mint, open it and everything listed there is replica or copy in the ad title.
     
  10. Debwests

    Debwests Junior Member

    So then it wouldn't have to have copy/replica on the coin as there were no actual proofs made, correct? It looks nice, espically without the copy/replica stamped on it. I think the nose looks too large though! lol!
     
  11. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

  12. Numismatist47

    Numismatist47 New Member

    Yes it would under law. If you look at the image under the eagles head you can make out copy.
     
  13. Debwests

    Debwests Junior Member

    Oh, i'ts on the right wing, i didn't see that. Thanks for pointing that out. :rolleyes:
     
  14. Debwests

    Debwests Junior Member

    "Washington proof reproduction" is what confused me, i didn't know there were proofs .
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page