1926 1/2 rupee P/l Restrike?

Discussion in 'World Coins' started by Barnabus, Aug 25, 2014.

  1. Barnabus

    Barnabus Member

    Here are three pics, one is a low light to prevent reflection to see surface and details. The other is for moderate lighting, please pay attention to the reflection of the reeding on the coin I am holding near it. Is this a P/L Restrike? This is a 1926 1/2 Rupee. I did not include a reflection pic of the back, just the low lighted one, although it does reflect the same. The surface of the coin is pretty dinged up, and scratched somewhat.

    This is Bombay (B) mint mark, I believe by the tiny dot at bottom of coin

    [​IMG][​IMG] [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2014
    chrsmat71 likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Numismat

    Numismat World coin enthusiast

    Sorry but no, a regular strike. The restrikes have much higher and sharper relief/details. Reflectivity is a secondary aspect, but generally the restrikes can function as an effective mirror.
     
  4. Barnabus

    Barnabus Member

    This coin is worn down as seen by the crown pearls melding together. It for sure has been circulated. The Rev of the coin looks very high and sharp to me dislike other I have. Were there differences in the P/L dies? I assume the P/L means they may have used the old P dies that had worn down and struck them over and over and over to gain a P/L state? I am not sure on this as I have little knowledge of P/L restrikes in general.
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2014
  5. Numismat

    Numismat World coin enthusiast

    They refurbished and polished up old dies and struck them either repeatedly or with much higher pressure, or both. The restrikes usually appear to have higher rims and sharper, more defined edge reeding as a result. Some people refer to die polish lines, but they are not always found on restrikes and are many times found on normal coins so this is not a reliable diagnostic.

    Also, restrikes were made after Indian independence, so would not have circulated.

    Here is one for comparison: http://www.ebay.com/itm/1928-Britis...4316959?pt=US_World_Coins&hash=item486ce0cc1f
     
  6. Barnabus

    Barnabus Member

    When I say circulated, maybe mishandled is a better word. I see similarities in the sharpness, but the lack of preservation on my coin makes it hard to tell. I think it could be A p/l. Based on the several other ones I have that are definitely circulation issue, which retain no luster, and some in just as good of shape. I will find out for sure soon as there is a coin show here soon
     
  7. Numismat

    Numismat World coin enthusiast

    Ok man, it's always a good idea to seek multiple opinions. Best of luck.
     
  8. Barnabus

    Barnabus Member

    Thank you! I figured I would ask here to find out specifics. It would be nice if it is a P/L, but I would end up selling it. I do not collect special coins, or restrikes, or errors. I do not sell my main collections even if I have doubles triples etc. However the special ones are a different story. If this is a P/L I could probably trade it for one of each year normal circulation under this KM# in decent shape.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page