1916 Buffalo Nickel GTG

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by BigTee44, Jan 3, 2017.

?

What does it grade?

  1. AU58

    1 vote(s)
    3.6%
  2. MS60

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. MS61

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. MS62

    1 vote(s)
    3.6%
  5. MS63

    2 vote(s)
    7.1%
  6. MS64

    4 vote(s)
    14.3%
  7. MS65

    11 vote(s)
    39.3%
  8. MS66

    9 vote(s)
    32.1%
  1. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    PCGS holder

    IMG_0698.JPG IMG_0699.JPG IMG_0700.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

  4. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

  5. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  6. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    I'd want to go 67, that's so fine. I mean it. Those are nice, fresh dies. What kind of error is that on the obverse overhanging the rim?
     
    superzimm likes this.
  7. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator


    That looks like a puckered insert.

    I suspect the coin to be graded ms65, but feel it could grade MS66.
     
  8. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    I never heard of that. I think I kind of like it, though. It makes the coin distinctive without disrupting the eye-movement through it, as a lamination or struck-through error might.
     
  9. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

  10. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I think you misunderstand: that isn't an error on the coin. It is the plastic gasket that is holding the coin in place.
     
  11. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    The pictures make it look 65, but I'm terrible at grading these (even worse from pictures). It looks attractive, but I'm not seeing a whole lot of luster in these pics.
     
  12. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

  13. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

  14. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  15. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    Such a fine example of an early Buffalo. (Indian Head nickel).
    They did make proofs that year for the 1916 Philly. Is this a proof?
    Otherwise I am in the MS-66 area.
     
  16. wxcoin

    wxcoin Getting no respect since I was a baby

    I would go with MS66. Nice clear coin and solid strike. I would love to include it in my 1916 year set.
     
  17. bill porter

    bill porter New Member

  18. Coinlover67

    Coinlover67 Well-Known Member

  19. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    66...I would go higher but I can,t vote any higher. I agree with Michael K...It looks PL
     
  20. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Lol. What a horse's ass. OK, but at least I still learned something...about plastic gaskets. No wonder I couldn't find this "error" on the Internet. :)
     
  21. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    I'll reveal the grade around 8 tonight for anyone else still wanting to take a stab at it.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page