1906 Strike Through Wire IHC...

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by armando0831, Nov 8, 2014.

  1. armando0831

    armando0831 Active Member

    I was going through some IHC I had and noticed that this coin had a something going on with it. You can see where the raised area crosses the S and the T, then shoots North then West. It completely closes the bottom loop of the S. image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Agilmore01

    Agilmore01 Well-Known Member

    Looks like displaced metal, not a strike through. You can see the depression where the metal came from and was pushed up to the spot you see.
     
  4. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    Agreed. If it was struck through something the strike through would be incuse.
     
  5. armando0831

    armando0831 Active Member

    When you say incuse, you're saying an impression of the object would be left?
     
  6. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    Like this:
    2006 LMC Struck Through.jpg This is a beat up example of a coin that was struck through a probable rim burr.
     
  7. Agilmore01

    Agilmore01 Well-Known Member

    Usually when something is struck through, it makes an indent in the coin in the shape of the object. You are thinking it may have been retained on the coin when the coin is struck, but you can still see where the metal was pushed up in the 3rd pic from damage.
     
  8. armando0831

    armando0831 Active Member

    I see. I've also read in The Price Guide to Mint Errors, that it would be incused if the wire fell out but can also be completely in the surface of the coin, showing as the wire embedded in the coin metal. They have an example of a wire embedded.
     
  9. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    Yours is not a wire embedded in the coin. As Agilmore said, you can see where the metal has been moved. Nothing but PMD.
     
  10. armando0831

    armando0831 Active Member

    I guess what's throwing me off is in the first picture, you can see where the damage comes from the rim then to the bottom of the S but the then there's metal closing the loop of the S, which is quite away from the line coming from the rim. The other thing is, how rounded this anomaly is. When I hear being pushed up, I think off one side being pushed up, while the other side does have some disfigurement but not rounded like the opposite side.
     
  11. Agilmore01

    Agilmore01 Well-Known Member

    The only other thing that would come to mind is a lamination error, but I still think it's just damage.
     
  12. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    Naw, not a lamination.
     
  13. Agilmore01

    Agilmore01 Well-Known Member

    Didn't think so, but trying to throw out any other possibilities.
     
  14. Mickey59

    Mickey59 Self-proclaimed numismatist!

    They didn't use clad planchets back then, did they? So lamination is not even a possibility.
     
  15. ziggy9

    ziggy9 *NEC SPERNO NEC TIMEO*

    Lamination error are not the product of clad coins. They result from imperfections in alloy mixes. They are seen more often on solid copper alloy (cents) and Nickel alloy (nickels) coins. They also are real common on war nickels.
     
  16. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page