1890 seated dime

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by johnny54321, Jul 7, 2009.

  1. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    I don't think I've posted this one before. Coin obviously has some issues. It was a whimsical but cheap purchase that will probably be resold. It DOES have a substantial amount of luster, especially on the reverse...which is about the only thing it has going for it..lol. I'm curious about your opinion of grade/problem status/ and approximate value?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    AU53 Details Cleaned? :D
    Sure is a nice dime, very good luster on the reverse.
     
  4. vipergts2

    vipergts2 Jester in hobby of kings

    I agree, to bad about the cleaning. I really like those coins. I went through a buying spree a couple years ago and bought a couple dozen circulated examples.
     
  5. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    XF details, cleaned, net VF. Worth a few bucks, but not much.

    Still a cool coin, and a good (and cheap) learning experience that would look nice in an album. :)
     
  6. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    Thanks for the comments. I agree with tmoney. Honestly, though this coin has some strike/surface issues, I believe the detail grade is solid AU, or at least it would be from a TPG. It has significantly more luster than my problem free 1891 10 cent ANACS AU-55, even with the potential cleaning. I'm not sure it's cleaned, but it definitely has hairlines and the color seems too "silvery" for an early dime....so maybe overdipped. It also has a thin obverse scratch, so it's definitely not problem free.
     
  7. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    Here is my 1891 for comparison. BTW, I decided to put my seated dime proof in the seated spot in my album, and I absolutely LOVE IT!! These other two will go up for sale.
     

    Attached Files:

  8. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    Okay if that is an AU55, then maybe the one you originally showed is an EF45-AU50, but I don't think any lower.
     
  9. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    Detail-wise, the 1891 is stronger. Luster-wise, the 1890 is stronger. I think they should receive the same technical grade from a tpg, although the 1890 would probably be considered cleaned/scratched. I simply do not see how the 1890 would be less than AU technically with the amount of remaining luster. It would probably net VF/XF due to the damage.

    I should add though that I believe my 1891 was overgraded at AU-55.
     
  10. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    The second coin looks much more original to my eye. I like that one (and still think it looks more like an XF coin rather than an AU one, sorry. :( )....Mike
     
  11. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    I totally agree.

    no need to apologize.:smile I remember you telling me that higher grade coins that have strike issues are graded by the amount of remaining luster. Based on this, I think you may change your mind if you were able to see it in hand.:whistle::cool:
     
  12. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I'll have to go with XF , Still a nice coin though .
    rzage
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page