1888 o vam 1a2 ( rim rash)

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by COOPER12, Feb 2, 2022.

  1. COOPER12

    COOPER12 Well-Known Member

    well I got this one today and the coin in hand is really attractive . Reverse especially .
    I was hoping it did not have rim damage but it appears to have some rim rash and I fear it would detail the coin. Just curious opinions on this. The rest of the coin is nicer in hand than even the pics 1888o1a.jpg 1888o1aa.jpg 88orim1.jpg 88orim.jpg
     
    Mr.Q and bear32211 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    Interesting. Are those file marks? Is it possible the rim took a hit then someone tried to repair it? If those marks were intentional I’m not sure she will straight grade. You may want to consider returning it if possible.
    A beautiful coin otherwise.
     
    bear32211 and Tusky Ranger like this.
  4. bear32211

    bear32211 Always Learning

    I agree with Dynoking, it's as though they ran the file from front back. Is there a rough feeling on the side ? Also, are there local shows in your area ? I'd take it and get opinions. Beautiful tone, I love them.
     
  5. COOPER12

    COOPER12 Well-Known Member

    it really feel rough , you can feel the area but its not really rough
     
    bear32211 likes this.
  6. bear32211

    bear32211 Always Learning

    Sad, maybe done to test for content ? But again a fine piece. I'd have it checked.
     
    Dynoking and COOPER12 like this.
  7. COOPER12

    COOPER12 Well-Known Member

    I don’t know it looks like it took a hit but not sure how pcgs will take it so best to return while I can just in case . The bummer is I paid a hundred and if it came back even 63 for vam 1a2 it’s worth double that at least.
     
    bear32211 likes this.
  8. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    Will any TPG authenticate the coin UNC Details with the VAM attribution?
    Or maybe it is best to bail while you can. I would think the seller tried (and maybe failed?) to enhance the coins value. That why you got a $200 coin for $100.
    One thing I have learned when looking at something for sale (house, car, coin) or even when I trying to find a mate; you look at the item or person for exactly what it is in front of you, not for what it could be.
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2022
  9. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    Fingerprints?
     
    bear32211 likes this.
  10. bear32211

    bear32211 Always Learning

    they are obvious, didn't want to bring it up.
     
    charley likes this.
  11. COOPER12

    COOPER12 Well-Known Member

    Looks to have a few probably from being in a album . I’m not concerned with those though as they don’t really bring down the eye appeal at all.
     
  12. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    If you like the piece and it appeals to you.....then don't be concerned about the "rim rash".
     
  13. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    The rim damage is minor and does not take away the eye appeal of the rest of the coin. We have three complete sets of Morgan and Peace dollars. In any condition they are all keepers, yours also. Thanks for sharing and good luck.
     
    COOPER12 likes this.
  14. COOPER12

    COOPER12 Well-Known Member

    It doesn’t bother me but since I’m building a graded E clash set I just worry it will come back details though I’m sure I could sell it if it does
     
  15. Tamaracian

    Tamaracian 12+ Yr Member--Supporter

    @COOPER12 That is an attractive coin (the fingerprints IMO don't detract--they blend into the overall toned field). The scraped area on the Reverse Rim is not overly deep, doesn't even touch the Denticles, and although lighter than the adjacent undisturbed Rim still has toning.

    The TPG's base the grade mainly on the appearance of the Obverse, so IMO I feel that you can get an MS (maybe a 65) grade IF you submitted it. Yes @Dynoking the TPG's will still grade a Top 100 coin even if Details Graded as-long-as you pay the Variety Attribution fee. If you still have doubts may I suggest sending it to ANACS (lowest overall cost) and see what it grades; their Variety Attribution Verification Fee is only $9 since you know what the VAM is.
     
    Dynoking and COOPER12 like this.
  16. COOPER12

    COOPER12 Well-Known Member

    here are a few more pics under magnification . It’s a small area but does this look filed ?
    9962A39D-F3C1-4631-982E-4EB1C3D391D3.jpeg 001F0B1F-EA2D-44EE-938F-EE4D90431803.jpeg
     
  17. FarmerBill

    FarmerBill Active Member

    Great pictures. My favorite dollar. I have a few 88-O's myself.
     
    COOPER12 likes this.
  18. COOPER12

    COOPER12 Well-Known Member

    someone else mentioned it may de from a detached lamination as well , though I do not know enough on that subject.
     
  19. Tamaracian

    Tamaracian 12+ Yr Member--Supporter

    As @FarmerBill said--great photos! The "marks" do look somewhat like one might expect if they took a narrow file to the edge and made one light pass, but why? Even contemporary users of Morgan Dollars and subsequent collectors had to know that that coin was genuine; yes, in the early days of federal silver and especially gold coinage some persons actually bit into the coin to see if it was actually authentic (e.g. not gold plated lead), but that is not the case here. If someone wanted to remove some of the metal to accumulate for later use they more than likely would have removed much more than that little area of the Rim. IMO, a plausible explanation may be that that Reverse Rim Edge may have contacted a part of the Press Mechanism during coin ejection as the Reverse faces the Anvil Die and is exposed when the Die rises after the coin is struck and is then moved by the Ejection Slide into the Collection Bin.
     
    COOPER12 and Dynoking like this.
  20. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    The second set of pictures causes me to second guess my opinion of filing. The surface is too wavy. A filed surface would be flat. Would tooling have been a better term? Tamaracian's explanation of a mechanical issue may be more plausible. Perhaps some of our error experts can offer an opinion?
    Tamaracian's suggestion of using ANACS may be your best bet if you are intent on keeping your coin. I had the same thought but we were leaning toward using your return privilege.
    You have the coin in hand. How distracting is the rim rash to you? You have a $200 + coin for $100. Only you can make a value judgement.
    Great post! Happy collecting, all the best!

    PS
    I currently have over 500 Morgans to examine. I'm jonesing for a clashed E myself...
     
    COOPER12 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page