I had this guy walk into the store this week. With a mintage of just 4,000 pieces this is a very rare coin. NOTE: The punch mark looking mark in the center of the obverse is on every genuine coin and is not damage it is a die marker for genuine coins. We are sending it to PCGS for grading. What do you think PCGS will call it?
I say VF the surfaces look harshly cleaned to me, though please educate me, Matt. because I know you better than to send a coin that would likely body bag. What's with the surfaces on this coin?
I assume you are asking me that question. The rim looks like it came out of a bezel. Maybe it is just your photo. but it looks like it is half reeded.
I think it might be the picture. I didn't note any sign of it being in a bezel in hand. She's out the door to PCGS now.. Time will tell.
Looks normal to me. I had a very similar looking 73-S, and the reeding looks very similar to that coin, which graded without a problem.
Is that just the way that gold coins wear? I have to admit, my experience in grading gold coins is almost non-existent
I would guess VF35-XF40. Depends on the weight they give the scarcer year. However, saying a US gold piece has a scarcer year is not much of a stretch. There is tons of scarce gold with not much of a premium. Look at all of the civil war dates. I am not really seeing a bevel, but probably an old cleaning. I am guessing they are saying the old cleaning is acceptable.
Boy that coin has had a rough life. Personally I'd say (35)VF/details. Who knows what they'll say, but I'd be flabbergasted if it comes back any better than XF/details.
Gold in the 1870's was all over the map in terms of quality of striking. Grading much of the gold is as date-specific as are buffalo nickels.