1857 seated dune

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by johnny54321, Dec 16, 2008.

  1. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    upgrade to the type set. opinions?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. borgovan

    borgovan Supporter**

    Opinions? Sure!

    EF-40. Minor obverse rim ticks, not significant enough to mention. Obverse hit to the dentils that is large enough to mention.

    Very nice coin. I like to see them survive in this condition.
     
  4. Greyford

    Greyford Senior Member

    Nice coin. Was it a jewelery piece or a weak strike? The top obverse and the bottom reverse dentils look really mushy. Otherwise I think it's nice and the color is good also.
     
  5. FreakyGarrettC

    FreakyGarrettC Wise young snail

    I may be wrong as I dont collect these but something doesn't look right. It's probably just my imagination. :)
     
  6. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    If it is, we are both imagining the same thing.

    I want to know how those denticles got so long.
     
  7. FreakyGarrettC

    FreakyGarrettC Wise young snail

    Face?
     
  8. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    weight is correct and it passes the ring test. not that it means it still couldn't be fake.

    I believe it has an old cleaning.
     
  9. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Look at the denticles on the bottom of the reverse as compared all the others - they are at least twice as long, or more. I'm looking thru all 1857 dimes I can find right now - never seen anything like that.
     
  10. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Dune is an old movie i'd rather forget about...
     
  11. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    sorry, typo.

    the squared off portion of the rim is weak and merges with the denticles which makes it look that way. The actual distance from the most inner part of the denticles and the edge of the coin is the same distance.

    Look at the obverse at 9-oclock on this one. same effect imo.

    http://coins.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=68101&Lot_No=61689#Photo
     
  12. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Naa... don't make it.
     
  13. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I dunno Johnny. The rim is formed by an outer flat edge around the die. I can think of no way that could happen. Just my opinion.
     
  14. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    those bottom denticles match to the same situation n the top obverse.

    looks like it is a weak strike in that area?
     
  15. bqcoins

    bqcoins Olympic Figure Skating Scoring System Expert

    I can say the coin is pretty nice but perhaps it needs a new cleaning to cover up the old cleaning.
     
  16. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    I suspect it is die erosion (sometimes called die crumbling). Look carefully -- it's not that the denticles are becoming longer, but rather the rim eroding. I see it all the time with large cents of this era, and while I don't follow this series closely, there's no reason to believe it couldn't happen to dies striking the less malleable silver (particularly if they were slightly misaligned).

    All IMHO & respectfully submitted....Mike
     
  17. Collect89

    Collect89 Coin Collector

    Hello johnny54321

    What does the reeding look like at 12:00? See if there is evidence that it had a loop from being used in jewelry. I recommend you always look at 12:00 for evidence of tooling.

    BTW, the photo shows that it has really nice details & some evidence of an old cleaning. Are you going to put it in a type collection album?

    Very best regards,
    collect89
     
  18. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I understand Mike, but it is something I have never seen before. I said the denticles getting longer because that was the easiest way of saying it.

    As for the rim of the die eroding, not gonna say it couldn't happen but I find it unlikely because that is one of the strongest parts of the die, especially on these coins because the rim is so wide. Now I could see it if perhaps the entire section of the rim gave way and broke off. But just the inside edge, and to have that break remain perfectly flat and smooth as is indicated by the surface of the coin ? And smooth on both the vertical and the horizontal surfaces ? That I can't buy. Metal breaks just don't happen that way.

    And if the metal did break, or even erode away thru excessive use - what is then that pushed or held the metal between the rim and the denticles down flat ? So I'm sorry pal, there had to be something there on that die or it wouldn't look like that. I am still suspicious.
     
  19. Greyford

    Greyford Senior Member

    I think it is a good coin for your typeset collection if the rest of the collection is VF - XF. I would put it in my typeset collection. (If I had one.)
     
  20. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    Thanks, I checked and didn't see any evidence of tooling. I do agree with you that the coin has been cleaned and it also has some surface residue in some places. I don't mind cleaning(very much) as long as there is sufficient retoning. 150 year old blast white silver coins aren't my thing.:kewl: It is residing in my typeset album.


     
  21. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    GDJMSP: I see what you are noticing with the denticles. Did you look at the heritage auction link I posted with the certified dime? The transition and look of the denticles are exactly the same in my opinion. On both coins, the outer rim band gets gradually thinner and thinner. Of course, the certified one could be fake as well.....but whatever it is, I think I am seeing the same type of cause on both coins.

    Thanks for the opinions guys. Always good learning! :D
     

    Attached Files:

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page