1855/4 25C BG-106 California Fractional Gold PCGS MS 63 Uncirculated Quarter

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Chris Winkler, Jun 4, 2021.

  1. Chris Winkler

    Chris Winkler Well-Known Member

    MS 63: Really?
    s-l1600-4.jpg s-l1600 copy.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2021
    Dynoking and SensibleSal66 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    What am I missing here ? o_O
     
  4. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    The coin was ugly when it was struck.
     
    Paddy54 and Dimedude2 like this.
  5. Vess1

    Vess1 CT SP VIP Supporter

    It looks like a gold fractional of some sort. It's certainly not a quarter! Mustve been a Monday for the label guy. lol
     
    john65999 and Chris Winkler like this.
  6. Chris Winkler

    Chris Winkler Well-Known Member

    Good grief! Is this really a MS 63??? Come'on man!
     
    john65999 likes this.
  7. Lueds

    Lueds Well-Known Member

    Counterfeit? or legit
     
  8. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    What a disaster cal gold was in terms of quality when they were made. Theyre an entire expertise all on their own
     
    Dave Waterstraat likes this.
  9. Dimedude2

    Dimedude2 Member

    California fractionals are consistently poorly struck.
     
    MIGuy, Paddy54 and charley like this.
  10. Chris Winkler

    Chris Winkler Well-Known Member

    I am only referring to the scratched appearance given a MS 63. Why do some coins like a CC Morgan and this one that is scratched to heck get a MS 63?
     
  11. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    I have one, not sure of the variety, but..

    If that is a 63, mine is a 71
     
    Dimedude2, johnyb and Dynoking like this.
  12. Dimedude2

    Dimedude2 Member

    I have say, a grade of 63 seems to be high. 60 if anything.
     
    john65999 likes this.
  13. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Die appears to have been badly rusted and then "cleaned up". I suspect a lot of those "scratches" are actually raised die scratches from the abrasive cleaning the die received.
     
    Paddy54 likes this.
  14. john65999

    john65999 Well-Known Member

    just posted about a 67+ ike that should be a 65 or 66, pcgs has some drunken moments, i own a kennedy silver proof i paid 48.00 for that has a scratch (although faint) on head going length of portrait, and bag marks (showing the 3 blips of a reeded edge) ok i can understand not seeing the scratch , but how in hampton does a proof get "bag marks" ????
     
    Chris Winkler likes this.
  15. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    I'm uncertain about the rariety of the particular specimen, but that may of also been the reason for the grade...a huge grading curve..I do know fake cali fractional gold are probably out number the genuine ones 100 to 1..If not more. I would advise any one purchasing one to do your homework before you pull the trigger.
     
    john65999 likes this.
  16. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    But it is 25 cents… that label is correct. It’s a California Fractional Gold.
     
  17. Lueds

    Lueds Well-Known Member

  18. MIGuy

    MIGuy Well-Known Member

    Maybe I should crack open my NGC details AU 1876 Octagon .50 fractional CA gold slab and submit it to PCGS! (kidding!) fractional gold obv.jpg fractional gold rev.jpg fractional gold ngc.jpg ;)
     
    Chris Winkler likes this.
  19. Vess1

    Vess1 CT SP VIP Supporter

    Oh. Never knew that.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page