1851 1/2c GTG Eric Newman Collection

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Kirkuleez, Mar 4, 2016.

  1. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    I picked up this little beauty the other day even though it resides in a problem holder. From the collection of the 1/2 cent king himself; Eric Newman. I love that it came with the old paper holders. What do you think NGC called the problem? Truth be told, I don't see any evidence of what they called the problem, but clearly the color is off. Still a cool coin in my book. Sorry that the pics are a little blurry, I was having a really tough time shooting it through the slab. image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Just a tad blurry Kirk. A re-shoot is a must be........
     
  4. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    I'll try again.
     
  5. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Love ya for it.......:)
     
  6. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    Try these on for size. These are pretty representative of the coin in hand. The good news is that I have another reason to dislike slabs. I think that I'm going to return it to its paper holder soon, it just seems right. image.jpg image.jpg
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  7. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    Without cheating I am guessing they gave it environmental damage
     
  8. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

  9. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    Hmmmm, there appears to be some sort of faint faint lines behind the head and a touch above from the picture. Really hope that didn't get it some weird polished/whizzed grade if its not that or cleaning I am stumped.

    From the pics the color appears to be the only thing that really should have been a problem for that
     
  10. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    I dunno. I'm going with a generic "cleaning". The color is not the worst I've seen, but I think living in that paper envelope for a few more years will help that. :)

    Edit: Ok, so, I'm wrong. I found the coin online. I don't see evidence of what they said, either.
     
    Kirkuleez likes this.
  11. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    62/63 RB Marks aren't the problem. Luster is.
     
  12. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I agree. I'm not seeing any luster. Looks to me like it was cleaned at some point in it's life. Still a really nice coin. I would have no problem having it in my collection.
     
  13. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Altered surfaces or whizzed would be my first guesses as to problem. Something gave it the look of false luster.
     
  14. bdunnse

    bdunnse Who dat?

    I'd bet whizzed. Not a bad look if you ask me!
     
  15. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Welcome to thumb a ride and join my collection!
     
  16. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    it was once laquered.
     
  17. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    If the color is accurate, sort of pinkish-red? I'd think it had been cleaned. On the obv I see what look like hairlines from NE to SW.
    Beautiful detail, though, every star is perfect.
     
    Kirkuleez likes this.
  18. David Setree Rare Coins

    David Setree Rare Coins Well-Known Member

    Cleaned/environmental damage.
     
  19. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    A few of you have hit it. I'm wondering if it was a pure guess or you actually see something. I'll post the slab later on.
     
  20. bdunnse

    bdunnse Who dat?

    Right or wrong, mine was a guess/hunch based on color.
     
  21. NSP

    NSP Well-Known Member

    I too was able to find the listing for this coin and I'm not sure what NGC saw that warranted the details qualifier they gave it. Nice coin regardless.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page