1799 large cent ???

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by JLP, Mar 4, 2012.

  1. JLP

    JLP COIN COLLECTOR/TRADER

    1799 1C-REV-SMALL.jpg 1799 1C-SMALL.jpg
    Hello,
    I am new to coin talk, I have been looking at this site for sometime, and it seems that there is some very knowledgeable people on this site, so I am reaching out and asking for help on this coin as I am not sure of this coin ...Is it a 1799 ??? any Thoughts??? Thanks in advance. JLP
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. splintercellsz

    splintercellsz CTs Local DJ

    Looks like this (It is hard to see the first #'s in your date, but it looks like a "7" to me):

    [​IMG]
    "The United States large cent was a coin produced by the United States mint and had a value of one penny or 1/100th of a U.S. dollar. The very first large cent was produced in 1793 and the series continued up to 1857. This was the very first coin that was produced by the United States that was produced solely by America. The large cent saw many designs and designers during the coin's production. There was 8 different designs from 1793-1857. The large cent was then changed to the same size pennies that we see today.

    Henry Voight was the designer of the 1793 large cent. The coin had a chain design of the reverse side of the coin and the design enraged the public. They said the coin depicts slavery. After only 36,103 produced coins, the design was changed.
    Later in 1793, Mint Director David Rittenhouse chose Adam Eckfeldt to change the design of the reverse. Eckfeldt discarded the chain design and replaced it with a wreath. On this coin, the hair on the obverse was longer and wider.
    In 1793, Rittenhouse hired Joseph Wright to change the design once more. In the early years, the large cent had many issues with striking and minting errors. Wright added a cap to this design, which stood for peace. He also changed the wreath to a laurel design. Robert Scot also helped with revisions of this design.

    Robert Scot was given the power to redesign all U.S. coins in 1796, including the large cent. This new design featured Liberty wearing a drapery at her neckline. There was also a ribbon added in her flowing hair. This coin was revised several times during this coin's design, but lasted until 1807.

    John Reich was chosen to change the design in 1808. Reich was Robert Scot's assistant at the time the design was once again changed. Robert Patterson was the new Mint Director at the time and he appointed Reich to do the design. This design was called the "Classic Head" design because of the fillet that Liberty wore. The coin was made with high quality copper, but very little metals. Due to this fact, the coin usually worn quickly. These coins are highly valued today because there are only a few known to exist in good condition.

    In 1816, the large cent was changed again. The new design was made by Robert Scot. On this design, Liberty was portrayed larger and stars were added on the obverse. It gave Liberty a younger look.

    The last design change came in 1935 when Christian Gobrecht redesigned the coin. He gave Liberty a slim look on the new design. The design was revised here and there, but made it through all the way until the last coins were produced in 1857. A mint employee took these large cent plachets and produced large cent coins dated for 1868. Only a few are known to exist today. They must have tried to sell the coins at the time because they were very rare."
     
  4. PittsburghMom

    PittsburghMom Active Member

    Great coin even if the condition is pretty rough!
     
  5. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

    It's really hard to tell since most of the diagnostic details have been obliterated. However, I tend to think it's not a 1799. There were only three (3) die pairs used in 1799...and the low position of the final number seems too low for the 1799. The cross bar of the fraction appears to extend further right on your coin than any of the 1799 coins, also. If it is a 1799, S-189 would be the closest match.

    If your coin isn't a 1799, the only other possibility might be a 1798. After reviewing the numerous die pairs of the 1798 issue it's still difficult to make a definitive match. The closest guess I can make is "possibly" the 1798 S-185.
     
  6. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    And with coins like this, you default to the more common issue if there is doubt. Its like a 1916 mercury, unless you can prove definitively the mintmark is a D you assume its an S if its so worn as to be unidentifiable.
     
  7. JCB1983

    JCB1983 Learning

    It looks like a 1798 to me, but I could be wrong. Great Find.
     
  8. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

    Where's Marshall when we need him?
     
  9. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    It's coins like this that might not be worth too much in financial terms, but is a living piece of history. Very cool.
     
  10. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

    Yep...Geo. Washington was still alive when the coin was struck...he may have held it himself!!
     
    Stevearino likes this.
  11. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    If that makes you all tingly, you just might be a coin nut. Oops, isn't that another thread :)
     
  12. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

    [​IMG]
     
  13. JCB1983

    JCB1983 Learning

    Here are some historical events which happend in the U.S. 1798-1799 (wikipedia)

    1798






    ·
    1799








     
  14. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    Yep - you need Marshall or Conder101 to weigh in on this one. I just can't see enough to make a guess or determine what it might be.
     
  15. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    It definitely isn't S188 or NC-1, the spacing of the date isn't right. I tend to discount S-189 because the stem of the berry to the right of the E in ONE is longer than it should be and the fraction bar is heavy and seem skewed right. the fraction bar on the 189 is fairly thin. I see no trace of the lump between the E of ONE and the T in CENT. (The lump isn't always there, but it usually is.) I wish part of LIBERTY was still visible. that's one of the first places I look at when checking a 1799.

    Over all the general impression I get looking at the coin is that it is a 1798. Just the overall look and the general shape of what I can see of the last digit to me says 98.
     
  16. icerain

    icerain Mastir spellyr

    The last digit is an 8, its hard to see but you can play around with the image with a photo software.
     
  17. JLP

    JLP COIN COLLECTOR/TRADER

    Thanks for the info!

    Thank you all of you guys for your responses, I really appreciate it. I have alot of coins that I am really not sure of...
    I will be posting a few more threads......VERY MUCH APPRECIATED FOR EVERYONES TIME.
    THANKS,
    JLP
     
    Stevearino likes this.
  18. my wife kids and i where camping in the desert in emery county utah i was using my new metal detector i got that christmas and i found a small box that was wrapped up in old looking bag about 1 foot in the dirt when i opened it it had 4 coins in it a 1880 silver dollar a 1866 silver dollar and a old looking AVI hotel and casino silver dollar token a ring that looked like it came from the nose of a cow and a 1793 large penny i dont know anything about coins so when i first saw it i thought it was one of them novelty coins never heard of a large cent before so i just tossed it in my comp desk that was about 8 years ago my hard drive crashed and i had a new friend help me install a new one when he saw it he about passed out and told me what is was and how much it might be worth is there away to see if its real i still have all the coins but not the cows nose ring
     
  19. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Would be nice to see a picture.
     
  20. l.cutler

    l.cutler Member

    I agree, a picture might be able to answer the questions, or at least point you in the right direction.
     
  21. Eduard

    Eduard Supporter**

    Worn out 1798's often get mistaken for 1799's, and in this case I can see why the OP initially thought that this was a '99.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page