http://www.premiumnumismatics.com/d...rt=11981288368907147&--eqskudatarq=2199444001 note seller's description...i only wish all CAC peddlers were this honest.
Which begs the following questions... #1 - Which CAC peddlers are not honest? #2 - Are those that peddle CAC coins any more or less honest than the average dealer? #3 - Why the anti-CAC slant? Buy the coin, not the grade and not the sticker. Respectfully...Mike
WOW, that's not a bad price even with the disclaimer... As far as CAC goes personally I can live without the ENTIRE TPG craze which is In My opinion ruining the coin market. Just another tentacle to deal with... take Care Ben
''Why the anti-CAC slant?'' it seems kosher to bang on sgs and the others in the herd of lesser respected third party authenticators/slabbers for inaccurate or inconsistent grading/approval. i see no reason why my opinions cannot be voiced...cac has a shoddy business plan at best and they [cac] are inconsistent when comes to their ''setting the standard for premium quality'' services. if you are willing to serve/take the publics' money; you are open to public ridicule. the bottom line is...it's all subjective. edit-btw, i wouldn't be disappointed if i found that flowing damsel in my stocking, cleaned/re-toned or not. Leadfoot, don't be lazy...you can google the answers to #1 and #2...al gore blessed us with this wonderful resource...put it to use.
And I only wish that all coin dealers, not to mention, all people, were that honest. My wishes don't come with an agenda.
Thank you for the response, and I respect your right to express your opinion. My questions were trying to get under why you have voiced that opinion and how you arrived at it. It just seemed to me your post was rather prejudicial, and this is echoed in your response as well as your previous comments on this topic. But getting past that, you've shown no evidence whatsoever that "cac has a shoddy business plan at best and they [cac] are inconsistent when comes to their ''setting the standard for premium quality'' services." While you are certainly entitled to your opinon, I am equally entitled to question your obvious slant, particularly with no evidence whatsoever to support your conclusion, and to the contrary you have admitted that you'd be happy with the coin if it were yours. I'm not saying you're wrong, as you certainly may be right, but show me some (subjective) evidence as to why I shouldn't dismiss your observations as the words of someone jaded and/or prejudicial. Respectfully submitted...Mike p.s. I resent you inferring I'm lazy, and I thought it was rather obvious why I asked quesitons #1 and #2. In the event it wasn't, it was to point out the prejudicial slant to your post.
