Looks like a solid 67 to me. Obverse 67 Reverse 66. Only thing distracting to me was what seems to be a carbon spot on the reverse under the R....
45-S :cigar:
I do agree with the two above even on their exact designation for each column. 6-5-4-5 all day.
Obverse looks every bit of 66-67. Soft strike and near terminal toning are my only downsides. Reverse a bit lower at 65 and doesn’t seem to have...
Thanks for the tag guys. Definitely miss it around here!! I opened up a new Restaurant for my company. We just lapped a year being open in July....
MS Details
I’ll guess 65. Looks like an old NGC fatty to me. Could have also toned in the holder. The strike on that coin is hammered. Great eye appeal and...
Looks like a 67 to me. I think it’s a 66+ that got a color bump to 67. I could also see it in a 66* slab but I know how tough stars are on these...
67
66 I don’t think they have it FS due to the small scrape between columns 3 & 4.
66 5FS That small blemish on the reverse pulls it down a grade. Obverse is 67 all day.
66+ 5FS The luster on this one looks great although maybe muted an bit from the toning. Great strike and eye appeal. Small flaw on reverse near...
65 5FS Talk about a beat down on the submission this go round.
67 I bet this is a luster bomb in hand. The die polish parks are a bit much for me. Those make me want to say 66 but I don’t think the graders...
66+ 5FS
67+6FS
Such remarkable photos. I have seen a lot of your work and the details always blow me away. This is just incredible!
66 due to weak strike / die deterioration. 67 due to eye appeal and luster. 67 overall
I don’t think this one gets the FS. The other 38 had one area under column 3 in question. To me this one seems to have some bridging under column...
I agree. Initial thought was 67 but surely it would have gone 66 minimum. If only we could send it to CAC…. :blackeye:
Separate names with a comma.
