Today when I was at the my local coin dealer and had them take a look at it and they called it an AU-55. I think the picture was a little to...
"That coin was cleaned and altered IMO" I'd have to completely disagree with you. Im just curious how you reached that conclusion.
As always thanks for your input guys.:thumb:
LOL I wouldnt mind having some money blow over here.
Nice coin, I'd say MS-63/64
LOL I got a MS-67 + from the bank yesturday.
Uncertified 1897 Morgan. Any ideas on a grade would be greatly appreciated. :hail: [IMG] I personally give it an AU-55.
If we only could compare the two coins in hand it would be apparent the difference between bag marks and wear
I just cant see that coin going MS-60.
I just grabbed it off coin values online which seems to run high.
I'd say $95-100 on the nickel and 60-70 on the dime.
None other than this one
LOL Sure you didnt
Personally id get it slabbed and hold onto it for a while.
Yeah that actually does appear to be a weak strike. The cheek on the obverse has very little scratches for a coin with that many marks in the...
AU-58 looks about right
They happen to be the only coinage made in the past 70 years that i like. I have 2 of them in MS-69 PCGS certified.
Im glad im not the only one who felt that it was undergraded. MS-64 * Battle Creek Collection
Id say EF-40/VF-35 and $20.
Here is one of my 1886 Morgans graded by NGC. I will post the grade it was given in a day or two.:kewl: [IMG]
Separate names with a comma.
