nothing of note
I keep these too!
I guess I need to brush up on my error lingo. Have never heard of a "retained internal die break"! Can someone please post a verified example for me?
Nice, a keeper in my book!
Spend it! or throw it in your scrap copper jug, like I do!!
Yup, I keep these for the die crack, but I try real hard to ignore those stupid bubbles!
Nasty, nasty, nasty...yuck....I hate those pennies that have been sitting around in water puddles.
They didn't use clad planchets back then, did they? So lamination is not even a possibility.
I apologize for offending you, see my other response.
Agreed, but unfortunately the written word does not give us the inflection necessary to give a sense of the mood of the "speaker", so sometimes...
Actually, I signed up in 2006, but haven't even been lurking all that time. Just recently came back and decided I want to get more involved in the...
Thanks!
Agreed, because the clip is straight, it was probably one of the last on the metal strip, and made it's way throught the whole process. Nice find,...
Obverse struck weak, reverse looks normal....IMHO...a "spender".
Agreed, this just looks like a "spender" to me.
I was wondering the same thing!
I'd like to see the edge and reverse.
The double eye and mouth you think you are seeing is just circulation markings. agreed with dt menace.
OMG! maybe I should start listing all my pseudo errors. I remember collecting the 1976 quarters with the incomplete drum rim thinking it was a big...
If the marks on the reverse are die clash, I can't see where they would come from on the obverse. Maybe its foreign object damage?...
Separate names with a comma.
