936
Here's what I think...we are all gonna say this or that...then Conder is gonna look at it for 2 seconds and nail it....
LP1-0 LP2-0 LP3-0 LP4-0 I don't see the big deal on these...waaaaaay to many made.
So did I...apparently two(More?) coins having the exact same AT-type toning doesn't bother his sales pitch one bit.
This guy is not only too lazy to take a decent photo, bot too lazy to take two photos......
Flip over double strike...no more , no less...happens alot...
I'd say give a good bath in acetone, perhaps some Vedigone...give it a nice olive oil facial...then re-try the photo.
Yeah...what he said....:thumb:
Looks like Abe didn't get his Mumps vaccine....
New baby huh..congrats... That should be around 36 for a week...
What about....you don't have a middle name??
Gotta admit...this is a fun read...never before have I had so much enjoyment from reading about something practically worthless...Conder nailed...
Being a trucker...I see a couple things wrong with your analysis... If using 53' trailers...max load in a dry box would be about 52,000lbs....
I notice the 'E' in STATES is right over one of the lines and not affected at all. Tells me this was done before minting.
I don't understand why someone would remove the mm on this one..devalues it immensly.
My pocket change goes straight to the wife...sometimes she even lets me count it....
The mint mark was hand punched into the die...and sometimes they didn't put it in the exact same place as the original.
I guess this will be ok for now...until she starts wanting the same things you do....:pencil:
I think in an NGC or PCGS slab 63RB would be it...looks like an older ANACS slab...hafta go 64RB then.
The MM is higher than the pic in ?1....
Separate names with a comma.
