The 1955S coin with the die chip in the upper 5 is 1955S-1MM-002. :)
That is a nice example. For those who don't know the difference, the tops of those letters would be the machine doubling, and the notching at the...
The image is way too small for anyone to tell for sure.
Hmm, there's a BIG difference between errors and die varieties...and the Cherrypickers' Guide lists die varieties - not errors. Reason I discern...
Unfortunately that's exactly what it is...counting machine damage.
Yup, completely normal.
Okay...first, the coin isn't worth grading, even if it is real. It's farr too gone in damage to be a valuable coin. Second, it looks fake to...
Hi again... The name is Chuck, not Ed. Anyhow, if this is an RPM, it has a value of between $10 and $15 depending ont he coin's grade. It...
Okay, I'm not really sure where to start... First off, there is no evidence in the images that this is a doubled die at all. I don't see any...
Hi.. I didn't know the message you sent was there until today...about the 1963. I would very much enjoy it if you sent it. Much appreciated!...
It is a normal coin. The A of STATES is centered between the Ts. On the close-AM the A is closer to the right T.
Longacre doubling with a die clash. Pretty common for 3c nickels.
This is not die deterioration - it is master die doubling that is exhibited on many war nickels.
Small date is on the left, large date is on the right.
That coin has been turned in a lathe or ground down using a grinding wheel. It was not minted that way - it's damage.
It's actually a coin where a thin layer was splitting away from the planchet when it struck. The strike folded over the thin layer and struck it...
Definitely a replated coin. The doubling is most likely a combination of the replating and some die wear.
Yup, just a normal coin.
Very minor machine doubling. sorry.
Confirmed. 1997P-1DO-001, CONECA DDO-001. Congrats!
Separate names with a comma.
