This coin obviously resided next to an uncirculated coin. That’s closely, right?
http://www.smalldollars.com/
The doubling you are seeing is mechanical doubling and worn die issues. The die cracks are neat but don’t really add any value....
I have read die clash and die chip. After looking more closely, I’m in the die chip camp.
I think it’s a die clash that is identified by an “arrowhead” in the loop of the 6.
Looks like a worn die issue.
What does the reverse look like?
Post mint damage from: [ATTACH]
Yep.
Yeah, that’s the pup I saw too.
It looks like a DDO also. [ATTACH]
So what is the history of these coins?
Try verdicare first.
I would try a q tip with acetone. That should tell if it’s PCV.
It is a rim to rim die crack(pre cud). But when that crack shows vertical or horizontal movement (as this coin shows) it is called a retained cud....
http://cuds-on-coins.com/retained-cuds/ You can see the vertical movement best at the A.
Congrats! You deserve every one.
Looks like a De-lamination before strike.
Nice example. 1994 had several different ones. Maybe you could attribute it: http://cuds-on-coins.com/ldb4-1994/
Separate names with a comma.
