[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH]
A piece of scotch tape?
I bored out a capital holder to fit. Thanks [ATTACH]
Thanks John. Looks like I’ll be making a hole larger tonight LOL
Thanks Mainebill. You avatar reminds me of our black cat at home, and our bunny that thinks she's a cat LOL [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Nevermind. NGC and others have the diameter listed as 18.2 mm which explains why it doesn't fit in a regular 18 mm capitol holder. PCGS had it...
Something is off on this 1834 classic head quarter eagle... It is too big for a capital 2.50 holder Slightly bigger than 18 mm PCGS says it...
Thank you Fred. Photo 3 is more representative of the area, it sits above the neck, similar to what I’ve read about a die chip. Thanks for your help!
Here is a close up of the neck area. Thanks for your help.
I picked this up recently and think it has the following: Die crack on obverse starting above Liberty's head and splitting off around 1:00 Die...
I’d think that unique Auction appearances would be a better metric than attempting to estimate remaining samples of a given date and type.
That is a wonderful coin!
PS as you noted the reflective surface must be a diffusive surface.
I tested the repeatability of your experiment, and it went very well. I repeated your test using: 1994-P PF69 Proof Silver Eagle 1986 PF69...
@Evan8 and others who commented; looking at and talking about this coin made me realize that in general, I favor the look of a flying eagle...
Thanks for all of your comments! Great stuff! @johnmilton that’s a nice example. The hair detail in yours is more defined, as is the breast....
Great experiment! I'm going to try when I get home :brb:
Thanks all! Appreciate the input. Mitch.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Here are a few more photos at 7x Thanks for your thoughts
Separate names with a comma.
