@Morgandude11 is feisty today ( Actually yesterday, but that was a 10 buck butt ugly day too) :-)
This was a duh moment on my part, of course the majority here is correct.
Those are polish marks coming from the die - Different than lines created from cleaning. Looks like the scrapes on the coin is why it got a 61 -...
I like em as a 64pl-s and a 63-o
I see nothing that is yelling counterfeit ..
Very Nice Chris
To me its a very environmentally damaged 'coin' BUT there is no overseeing any damage that could cause the trigger look on the "9" - I am going...
$100 for that coin is a good buy
XF Cleaned
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Slamming of the breast feathering makes me think 64 Gotta lean towards a Vam-13 from these pictures
My Thoughts also on the Vam-16
MS63 Maybe a vam 16 - check that out
The larger double intercept have no slots so can fit anything BUT the coins will all lean on each other - I dont have a problem with it but some...
@dwhiz You are just having too much fun. We are enjoying it too haha Carry on my friend
I am confused ….
It looks like a slight off center strike … not a recognized error that I know of
Well done sir ... and It looks lightly hit and I was coming it at 62 but lost the thread.
I like 67 also ( The sack holder is quite defined - (sorry I had to :-) ))
That's the AU55 - Right ? Nice
Separate names with a comma.