Thanks Burton, what gen is this then? I thought I read that the serial numbers without bar code went up to 300,000 or so with a few outliers...
Isn't that fishing line?
I am at 63 to 64 on that one, it would be hard to go any higher without the luster. Pics are getting better Barney.
Same here. There also seems to be some areas that are still a laminated. That would be a cool fragment to have.
@Burton Strauss III @Conder101 have there been earlier serial numbers with a bar code?
Allright here it is. I would like all my 63's to look like this. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] PS 6 of you voted 63' Well done!
A 70S small date not in the best of shape, this is the first I have found in pocket change. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I found this one in pocket change the other day. [ATTACH]
Welcome back!
I will give the reveal and slab photo this evening.
Beautiful coin @lordmarcovan the luster is amazing!
Walkers have always been tough for me to shoot when there is nice luster involved. Add in a slab and they are like this or dull and detailed. I...
When I look to grade a Walker, I always look at the hand to see how well it was struck.
I didn't look that close. I was thinking that the 39D was a rev of 38'
Those don't ever get old. I love the toning.
I was setting up my wall display the other day. Realized that I didn't have a Walker type in my Soapbox Anacs slabs collection. I found this one...
Fun thread Lehigh.
[ATTACH] Figured you for a more authentic version.
I had wondered if it was a pattern. Could just be a fake.
Don't worry Randy, it's ok if you want to play for both teams. I have buying ancients and moderns for years now.
Separate names with a comma.
