I like them, Randy! Enjoy!
My avatar was the one that got away. I never saw a specimen like it. I’m glad I took a photo when I did because shortly after the LCS sold it....
I was thinking the same but the wear on the E that’s adjacent looks the same. Placement looks correct too. I’m leaning that it’s genuine...
Under increasingly heavier use, details and devices will change. The outer devices are most susceptible and will migrate toward the rim. Many...
I think it is just dead-dead…or super dead
Damaged. Welcome to CT!
How did you come by that?
Nice coins folks! This is a fun one, too!! [ATTACH]
Just a thought: the dies start out as convex rods. It would be hard to believe that once the working die was made that any aspect of that would...
Good point. I read right through it. Doubling will 'evolve' only to the extent that the die evolves...or devolves. Of course, the variety sites...
Hi Eric - not a DDR. Have a look at the dots in EPU. They are not elongated. As such, not a DDR. A slightly more focused photo would bear that...
I found a 1975 Proof Jefferson in 2015. No telling how long it was in circulation but there were spots that still where shiny around devices....
Distilled water.
Not worth grading. Even in MS, it’s only $10 coin that you might get $8 for. As noted, the glue is a detractor and reaching an MS grade doubtful.
That’s it. - https://coppercoins.com/lincoln/diestate.php?date=1956&die_id=1956d1mm003&die_state=lds The two obverse markers are there.
I can’t see anything from this set of photos. Sorry.
Joe - skeptical that a soak in distilled water will work, but I’ve been surprised. You might start there.
And the 1941 has a nice reverse cameo effect. That would be a nice addition to an environmental set as with the 1955.
Great shot at finding a decent variety or error coin in that lot.
Also at MS-66. Looks like a solid strike and absent the obverse carbon spot, I think it might grade higher.
Separate names with a comma.
