@AnitaMore …the scope needs to have 3 Megapixel capability or better. Inexpensive ones tend to have 2MP and result in pixelation problems. Make...
Good find, Lou. Very attractive and great preservation…my guess is was released into circulation semi-recently from a collection, hasn’t...
It’s worth 1 cent. That is MD with wear…imo…Spark
Definitely PMD. People save damaged coins for a myriad of reasons… this one appears to be in the AU53 Red Brown neighborhood and that’s being...
INCORRECT. This is wide. These pictures of coins from pixelated computer screens are in no way capable of allowing any kind of definitive...
Not a keeper. Just a well circulated half dollar…imo…Spark
No. It is more probable that it is the beginnings of die deterioration…imo…Spark
AU55/58 with staining from environmental exposure. That is not normal toning. imo…Spark edit to add: USA Coinbook lists a MS60 at $.69. Your...
Needs better lighting but I think it is a complete design. However, this may be a proof dime ( S mint mark, and rims look squared). That means as...
@jim a baranak …please do the following next time you post: 1. Tell us what sort of doubling you suspect. Don’t make us guess. 2. Post a...
Local Oscillating Califragilistic Anomaly…(this means I haven’t a clue). Hopefully another member comes up with a better guess…Spark
As a zinc memorial and the last number of the date being a zero, it can only be 1990 or 2000. Honestly, it has the look of a zinc ‘90…imo…Spark
Yep…all 3: die erosion, mechanical doubling and wear…imo…Spark
@Pickin and Grinin @Evan Saltis …I totally respect your viewpoints. The underlying question was: When does an error occur? During the...
To many members this will seem like a mountain out of a molehill, but I have a coin that seems to be an error but not talked about very much....
Ed, I agree with the clash. The IDB looks to be riding high on the wing so it may have started with the clash. A better close-up would help but...
If you are referring to the crook of the left wing (as you look at the reverse), then I would hazard a guess it is a large die chip, modernly...
Well…the coin is a doubled die variety, so I put it in a 2x2 flip and labeled it truthfully and included “die marker not visible” on the reverse...
Once again, this is a misconception that keeps being perpetuated because of ignorance. Many members here will tell you you are wasting your time...
Yes, open a new thread. You are changing the focus of your post for any results you find. Regarding results…any doubling needs to be very precise...
Separate names with a comma.
